Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;7(24):20927–20944. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01662

Table 2. Comparison Result of the Proposed Method and Clarkson’s Method.

    proposed method
Clarkson’s method
parameters actual value evaluated value relative deviation (%) evaluated value relative deviation (%)
Ah, 104 m3 2280.00 2302.90 –1.00 2744.99 20.39
A, km2 0.6000 0.6060 –1.00 0.7224 20.40
Gm, 104 m3 18583.93 18770.57 –1.00 27735.27 49.24
Gf, 104 m3 822.75 831.02 –1.01    
Ga, 104 m3 5993.94 6054.14 –1.00 7216.35 20.39
Gd, 104 m3 8888.91 8978.18 –1.00    
G, 104 m3 34289.52 34633.9 –1.00 34951.61 1.93