Table 2. Mineral Content in Different Parts of the G. xanthochymus Fruit^a.

	Fruit arts
	μ/100 g Sample
Minerals	LPe	LPu	SDR	SDS	Significance
Zinc	4.63 ± 1.38b	1.00 ± 0.29a	1.25 ± 0.14a	1.50 ± 0.29a	P < 0.05
Calcium	40.25 ± 7.94a,b	59.00 ± 2.89c	26.50 ± 0.87a	53.75 ± 3.03b,c	P < 0.05
Iron	3.00 ± 0.58a,b	4.25 ± 0.14b	1.75 ± 0.43a	8.75 ± 0.43c	P < 0.001
Copper	0.25 ± 0.14a,b	0.75 ± 0.14c	0.00 ± 0.00a	0.50 ± 0.00b	P < 0.05
Potassium	321.25 ± 69.43b	453.00 ± 6.64c	171.75 ± 8.52a	424.50 ± 9.24b,c	P < 0.003
Manganese	0.25 ± 0.14	0.50 ± 0.00	0.50 ± 0.00	0.50 ± 0.00	NS
Magnesium	22.00 ± 3.75a	38.50 ± 5.77b	32.25 ± 1.01b,c	40.50 ± 1.44b	P < 0.05
Sodium	7.25 ± 3.03	1.50 ± 0.29	3.50 ± 0.00	3.25 ± 0.43	NS

^aNote: All the values are mean ± SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given row are not significantly different whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P < 0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test. LPe—lyophilized peel; LPu—lyophilized pulp; NS–not significant; SDR—sun-dried rind; and SDS—sun-dried seed.