Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;7(24):21172–21182. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01966

Table 3. Fatty Acid Composition in Different Parts of the G. xanthochymus Fruita.

  Fruit Parts
  Area%
Fatty cids LPe LPu SDR SDS SignificanceC
C10 (Capric Acid) 0.495 ± 0.01c 0.263 ± 0.00b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a P < 0.001
C12 (Lauric Acid) 6.727 ± 0.12c 2.985 ± 0.02b 3.309 ± 0.16b 0.00 ± 0.00a P < 0.001C
C16 (Palmitic Acid) 26.285 ± 0.23a 32.666 ± 0.02c 29.585 ± 1.16b 49.596 ± 0.09d P < 0.001
C18 (Stearic Acid) 13.041 ± 0.24c 10.283 ± 0.07b 13.549 ± 0.13d 1.892 ± 0.05a P < 0.001
C18:1 (Oleic Acid) 31.167 ± 0.60a 37.314 ± 0.25c 32.632 ± 0.13b 46.228 ± 0.00d P < 0.001
C18:2 (Linoleic Acid) 8.095 ± 0.15b 5.735 ± 0.06b 7.378 ± 1.91b 46.228 ± 0.01a P < 0.0
C18:3 (α-Linolenic Acid) 14.190 ± 0.32c 10.755 ± 0.16b 13.546 ± 0.34c 46.228 ± 0.02a P < 0.001
a

Note: All the values are mean ± SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given row are not significantly different whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P < 0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test. LPe—lyophilized peel; LPu—lyophilized pulp; ND—not detected; SDR—sun-dried rind; and SDS—sun-dried seed.