Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;21:42. doi: 10.1186/s12937-022-00789-7

Table 6.

The ORs (95% CIs) for the association between the quartiles of dietary pattern scores and hyperuricemia 

Quartiles of dietary patterns scores P
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Plant-based
 Model 1 1.00 0.85 (0.69–1.04) 0.90 (0.74–1.10) 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 0.42
 Model 2 1.00 0.80 (0.65–0.98)* 0.81 (0.66–0.99)* 0.74 (0.60–0.91)* 0.03
 Model 3 1.00 0.78 (0.63–0.96)* 0.812 (0.68–1.00)* 0.70 (0.56–0.87)* 0.01
Processed food diet
 Model 1 1.00 1.00 (0.81–1.23) 1.025 (0.83–1.26) 1.25 (1.02–1.52)* 0.08
 Model 2 1.00 1.01 (0.82–1.24) 1.002 (0.81–1.23) 1.18 (0.97–1.450) 0.27
 Model 3 1.00 0.99 (0.80–1.23) 0.94 (0.76–1.16) 1.19 (0.96–1.46) 0.12
Animal diet
 Model 1 1.00 1.38 (1.12–1.70)* 1.18 (0.95–1.46) 1.42 (1.16–1.76)*  < 0.01
 Model 2 1.00 1.41 (1.14–1.74)* 1.20 (0.97–1.48) 1.40 (1.14–1.73)*  < 0.01
 Model 3 1.00 1.38 (1.11–1.71)* 1.180 (0.95–1.47) 1.40 (1.13–1.74)*  < 0.01
RRR diet
 Model 1 1.00 1.32 (1.07–1.63)* 1.60 (1.30–1.97)* 1.38 (1.11–1.70)*  < 0.01
 Model 2 1.00 1.30 (1.05–1.61)* 1.53 (1.24–1.89)* 1.24 (0.10–1.54)  < 0.01
 Model 3 1.00 1.25 (1.00–1.56)* 1.42 (1.15–1.76)* 1.14 (0.91–1.42) 0.01
PLS diet
 Model 1 1.00 1.08 (0.87–1.33) 1.23 (0.10–1.50) 1.20 (0.98–1.48) 0.18
 Model 2 1.00 1.05 (0.85–1.29) 1.13 (0.91–1.39) 1.04 (0.84–1.29) 0.73
 Model 3 1.00 1.02 (0.83–1.27) 1.07 (0.86–1.32) 0.99 (0.79–1.23) 0.90

Model 1 was adjusted for gender and age

Model 2 was additionally adjusted for residence, education level, alcohol consumption, and smoking status

Model 3 was additionally adjusted for BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia

*P < 0.05