Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;3(3):125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.08.003

Table 1.

Methodological quality assessment through checklist.

Criteria # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Score %
Mahar et al. (2006) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 13 52
Budde et al. (2008) 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 15 60
Hill et al. (2010) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 15 60
Howie et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 18 72
Janssen et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 16 64
Ma, Le Mare & Gurd (2014) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 14 56
Riley et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 18 72
Carlson et al. (2015) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 19 76
Gallotta et al. (2015) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 14 56
Ma, Le Mare & Gurd (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 16 64
Altenburg, Chinapaw &
Singh (2016)
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 17 68
Goh et al. (2016) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 14 56
Riley et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 18 72
Schmidt, Benzing &
Kamer (2016)
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 18 72
Van den Berg et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 17 68
Wilson et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 17 68
Szabo-Reed et al. (2017) 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 17 68
Buchele Harris et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 15 60
Lind et al. (2018) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 18 72
Mavilidi et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 18 72