Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;11(6):867. doi: 10.3390/biology11060867

Table 2.

Pearson’s correlations for players at different playing positions between running performances and total group points of theirs teams (results are given as Pearson’s coefficient (p)).

CD FB CM WM FW Total Sample
TD −0.05 0.19 0.09 −0.37 0.24 0.04
(0.64) (0.13) (0.54) (0.06) (0.36) (0.57)
LIR −0.21 0.12 −0.03 −0.28 0.27 −0.04
(0.07) (0.34) (0.81) (0.16) (0.30) (0.50)
R 0.09 0.15 0.11 −0.40 0.28 0.07
(0.42) (0.24) (0.43) (0.04) (0.28) (0.29)
HSR 0.17 0.07 0.04 −0.12 −0.11 0.04
(0.14) (0.57) (0.79) (0.53) (0.68) (0.49)
S 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.24 −0.13 0.13
(0.13) (0.11) (0.17) (0.23) (0.63) (0.04)
HIR 0.19 0.14 0.08 0.00 −0.13 0.08
(0.09) (0.25) (0.56) (1.00) (0.63) (0.22)

Legend: TD—total distance; LIR—low-intensity running; R—running; HSR—high speed running; S—sprinting, HIR—high-intensity running; CD—central defenders, FB—full backs, CM—central midfielders, WM—wide midfielders, FW—forwards.