Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;11(6):707. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060707

Table 3.

Proportion of patients, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for different breakpoints according to the score predicting Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection.

Proportion of Patients TP FP TN FN Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
Score ≥ 0 100% 81 2572 0 0 1 0 0.03 - 0.03
Score ≥ 1 96.2% 73 2479 93 8 0.90 0.04 0.02 0.92 0.06
Score ≥ 2 88.5% 52 2297 275 29 0.64 0.11 0.02 0.90 0.12
Score ≥ 3 85.1% 39 2218 354 42 0.48 0.14 0.02 0.89 0.15
Score ≥ 4 84.2% 35 2200 372 46 0.43 0.14 0.02 0.89 0.15
Score ≥ 5 62% 28 1616 956 53 0.35 0.37 0.02 0.95 0.37
Score ≥ 6 19.3% 14 498 2074 67 0.17 0.81 0.03 0.97 0.79
Score ≥ 7 5.9% 6 150 2422 75 0.07 0.94 0.04 0.97 0.92
Score ≥ 8 1.2% 3 30 2542 78 0.04 0.99 0.09 0.97 0.96
Score ≥ 9 0% 0 0 2572 81 0 1 - 0.97 0.97

TP: True Positive; FP: False Positive; TN: True Negative; FN: False Negative; PPV: Positive Predictive Value; NPV: Negative Predictive Value.