Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;11(6):1127. doi: 10.3390/antiox11061127

Table 6.

Effect of extraction method on phenolic content pecan shell extracts *.

Sample Protocatechuic Gallic Catechin Vanillic Caffeic Syringic Ferulic Taxifolin Elagic Thymol
F150 3.7 ± 0.3 f 1.6 ± 0.6 h 1.5 ± 0.1 f 4.4 ± 0.2 e 2.9 ± 0.3 f 1.6 ± 0.1 gh 8.8 ± 0.2 e n.d. 6.5 ± 1.9 i n.d.
F125 3.87 ± 0.02 f 20.3 ± 0.5 bc 25.5 ± 0.3 a 4.4 ± 0.2 e 5.7 ± 0.2 b 0.6 ± 0.1 j 19.1 ± 0.5 b 8.25 ± 0.04 b 87.3 ± 0.1 b 0.15 ± 0.01 cd
F100 7.7 ± 0.1 d 12.6 ± 0.1 e 25.2 ± 0.8 a 4.401 ± 0.001 e 3.5 ± 0.1 ef 1.070 ± 0.001 i n.d. 4.9 ± 0.2 g 96.0 ± 1.4 a 0.28 ± 0.03 bc
F80 4.5 ± 0.2 f 12.8 ± 0.2 e 21.4 ± 0.5 b 4.1 ± 0.1 ef 4.4 ± 0.1 d 0.490 ± 0.001 j 7.85 ± 0.08 e 5.49 ± 0.02 f 74.7 ± 0.5 c n.d.
FSON 0.83 ± 0.05 h 9.1± 0.5 g 16.269 ± 0.001 cd 3.998 ± 0.001 ef 3.3 ± 0.2 ef 1.268 ± 0.001 hi n.d. 6.20 ± 0.02 e 50.5 ± 5.2 ef n.d.
FMIC 1.72 ± 0.06 g 15.8 ± 0.3 d 21.7 ± 0.6 b 3.8 ± 0.1 f 4.5 ± 0.2 cd 1.786 ± 0.001 g n.d. 6.4 ± 0.1 d 57.5 ± 1.2 de n.d.
S150 17.8 ± 0.2 a 41.6 ± 1.1 a 24.8 ± 0.1 a 12.031 ± 0.001 a 3.706 ± 0.001 e 10.7 ± 0.2 a 8.1 ± 0.2 e 2.21 ± 0.01 i 51.8 ± 1.2 e n.d.
S125 7.92 ± 0.09 d 14.35 ± 0.01 de 17.7 ± 0.4 c 6.6 ± 0.2 c 5.3 ± 0.2 b 4.430 ± 0.001 d 6.21 ± 0.04 f 2.82 ± 0.03 h 43.7 ± 1.0 f n.d.
S100 10.1 ± 0.5 b 21.9 ± 0.3 b 21.6 ± 0.7 b 7.7 ± 0.1 b 5.3 ± 0.1 b 8.2 ± 0.1 b 14.4 ± 0.3 c 7.61 ± 0.05 c 59.7 ± 0.6 d n.d.
S80 6.10 ± 0.05 e 10.9 ± 0.1 f 17.4 ± 0.4 cd 6.8 ± 0.2 c 5.274 ± 0.001 b 2.6 ± 0.1 f 13.1 ± 0.6 d 4.98 ± 0.01 g 35.3 ± 0.2 g n.d.
SSON 6.6 ± 0.2 e 10.51 ± 0.07 fg 11.3 ± 0.2 ed 6.1 ± 0.1 d 7.1 ± 0.3 a 3.010 ± 0.001 e 20.8 ± 0.3 a 9.30 ± 0.01 a 25.6 ± 0.2 h 0.5 ± 0.2 a
SMIC 8.93 ± 0.01 c 19.4 ± 0.3 c 15.6 ± 0.7 d 8.2 ± 0.2 b 5.1 ± 0.1 bc 5.3 ± 0.1 c 15.2 ± 0.4 c 9.16 ± 0.05 a 53.2 ± 0.2d e 0.41 ± 0.01 ab

* See Table 5 for the sample codes. Means in the same column with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, p > 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.