Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):182. doi: 10.3390/bs12060182

Table 2.

Comparison of ID Foci for Each Dimension Individually.

ID Dimensions Sample: ID Foci
1–3 PI/II PI/MoI PI/GI PI/SoI PI/OI II/MoI II/GI II/SoI II/OI MoI/GI MgI/SoI MgI/OI GI/SoI GI/OI SoI/OI
Cognitive S-E −8.42 *** −11.90 *** −10.99 *** −11.66 *** −10.88 *** −6.27 *** −4.42 *** −6.07 *** −3.90 *** −2.10 * −0.01 −2.83 ** −2.00 * −0.71 −2.72 **
L-E −15.07 *** −17.63 *** −15.81 *** - −14.96 *** −5.36 *** −0.63 - −1.03 −5.17 *** - −6.84 *** - −1.73 -
H-E −7.50 *** −9.23 *** −8.10 *** −6.37 *** −4.25 ** −2.83 ** −1.61 −0.92 −3.84 *** −0.79 −3.33 *** −6.20 *** −2.24 * −4.83 *** −2.64 **
Affective S-E −5.72 *** −12.86 *** −13.05 *** −12.88 *** −13.83 *** −8.21 *** −8.85 *** −8.97 *** −9.57 *** −0.76 −0.70 −0.72 −0.24 −0.24 −0.03
L-E −5.50 *** −15.91 *** −13.73 *** - −12.55 *** −11.82 *** −9.09 *** - −7.42 *** −3.72 *** - −5.48 *** - −2.01 * -
H-E −2.21 * −9.98 *** −10.04 *** −7.90 *** −7.24 *** −8.60 *** −8.78 *** −6.29 *** −5.68 *** −0.81 −2.43 * −2.45 * −3.06 ** −2.97 ** −0.16

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Weighted average effect sizes (expressed as Hedges’ g), estimated from statistical significance values of non-parametric assessment of difference between specific foci of employees’ identifications, were as follows. S-E sample: 0.034 and 0.29—for cognitive and affective dimensions, respectively. L-E sample: 0.21 and 0.26. H-E sample: 0.39 and 0.35.