Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;11(6):820. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060820

Table 3.

Policy recommendations.

S/N Policy Recommendations Details
1 Active engagement of other ICAMR agencies
  • More active participation from DTI, DILG, and DENR will provide a more holistic approach to tackle AMR.

2 More involvement of stakeholders beyond the policymaking level
  • LGUs should be empowered to implement AMR strategies at the local level.

  • Stakeholders on the ground, such as community pharmacists and those from the backyard farm sector, should be represented during policy discussions.

3 Define clear roles for all relevant stakeholders
  • Well-defined roles will help improve accountability and coordination required for effective implementation of all aspects of the AMR program.

  • Specifically, greater emphasis must be made in defining the roles of the local governmental units and civil societies.

4 Improve research capacity
  • AMR research serves to bridge knowledge gaps and provides evidence to build governmental support for development of better policies on AMR.

5 Develop better surveillance systems
  • The current AMR surveillance system is limited and should be extended to more surveillance sites, including private healthcare facilities, as well as areas in the animal and environmental sectors.

  • This should be supported by strengthening of laboratory infrastructures and capacity.

  • AMU surveillance systems should be established to better assess the level of AMU nationally.

6 Improve coordination across sectors through a One Health approach
  • Better integration across sectors is crucial to facilitate implementation of the NAP.

  • For example, an integrated AMR surveillance system will provide a clearer idea of the actual AMR situation in the country, possibly elucidating the transmission pathways of certain microorganisms.

7 Strengthen partnerships with organizations at the regional and international level
  • International collaboration supports knowledge generation and innovation, as well as provides an avenue for better resources and capacity to execute the implementation plans.

8 Develop monitoring and evaluation systems for all implementation plans
  • Monitoring and evaluation are key in determining effectiveness of a plan and providing evidence to inform policies.

  • Regular monitoring and evaluation activities will advise if the implementation plans are on track or if adjustments must be made.

9 Set intermediate targets for the implementation plans
  • These intermediate targets will pave a structured and systematic path towards programmatic success.

ICAMR = inter-agency committee on antimicrobial resistance; DTI = department of trade and industry; DILG = department of the interior and local government; DENR = department of environment and natural resources; AMR = antimicrobial resistance; LGUs = local government units; AMU = antimicrobial use; NAP = national action plan.