Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;11(6):925. doi: 10.3390/biology11060925

Table 1.

Characteristics of observational studies.

Reference Study Design Sample Size PA Measure Health Outcome Association
Camhi et al., 2015 [36] cross-sectional 46 ACC: ActiGraph GT3X+; triaxial
Volume (min/d): LPA, MPA, VPA, MVPA, MVPA bout (10 min);
TPA (counts/d);
Steps (n/d).
MS t-test:
(1) MHO group had significantly higher levels of LPA compared to MUO;
(2) No differences in MPA, VPA, MVPA, MVPA bouts, TPA, and steps between MHO and MUO groups.
Diniz et al., 2015 [37] cross-sectional 49 ACC: ActiGraph GT3x; triaxial
meeting/not meeting MVPA (150 min/w)
TNF-alpha, Fasting insulin, HOMA-IR U-test:
(1) Meeting MVPA volume had no effect on TNF-alpha, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR;
Graff et al., 2012 [38] cross-sectional 68 PED: BP 148
Steps (n/d)
TC, LDL, HDL, TG, FPG, PPG, Fasting insulin, Postprandial insulin, HOMA-IR t-test and U-test:
(1) No differences in TC, LDL, HDL, TG, FPG, PPG between Group (Steps/d < 6000) and Group (Steps/d ≥ 6000);
(2) Group (Steps/d < 6000) had higher fasting insulin, postprandial insulin and HOMA-IR than Group (Steps/d ≥ 6000).
Green et al., 2014 [39] cross-sectional 50 ACC: ActiGraph GT3X+; triaxial
Volume (min/d) of LPA, MVPA, MVPA bout (10 min)
FPG, SBP, DBP, TG, TC, HDL, LDL, HOMA-IR, Fasting insulin, CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha Regression:
(1) MVPA had no association with TG (adjusted for SB, VO2peak, BM)
(2) LPA was favorably associated with TG, had no association with HOMA-IR (adjusted for MVPA, VO2peak, BM).
Correlation:
(1) LPA was favorably associated with TG, TC, HOMR-IR; had no association with FPG, SBP, DBP, HDL, LDL, fasting insulin, CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha;
(2) MVPA was favorably associated with CRP, TNF-alpha; had no association with FPG, SBP, DBP, TG, TC, HDL, LDL, HOMR-IR, fasting insulin, IL-6;
(3) MVPA bouts were favorably associated with HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, CRP; had no association with FPG, SBP, DBP, TG, TC, HDL, LDL, IL-6, TNF-alpha.
Koniak-Griffin et al., 2014 [40] cross-sectional 210 ACC: Kenz Lifecorder Plus; uniaxial
Volume (min/d) of MVPA, MVPA bout (10 min)
Steps (n/d)
SBP, DBP, LDL, HDL, TC, TG, FPG Correlation:
(1) Steps/d were favorably associated with TG; had no association with SBP, DBP, LDL, HDL, TC, FPG;
(2) MVPA was favorably associated with HDL; unfavorably associated with TC; had no association with SBP, DBP, LDL, TG, FPG;
(3) MVPA bouts had no association with SBP, DBP, LDL, HDL, TC, TG, FPG.
Lecheminant et al., 2011 [41] cross-sectional 264 ACC: Actigraph; uniaxial
Volume (min/w) of MPA, VPA
meeting/not meeting MPA (150 min/w)
HOMA-IR ANCOVA: age, weight, BMI, %BF, and ACi
(1) Meeting MPA guidelines had favorable effect on HOMA-IR when adjusted for age or BM;
(2) Meeting MPA guidelines had no effect on HOMA-IR when adjusted for %BF, BMI, or ACi;
(3) Taking VPA ≥ 60 min/w had favorable effect on HOMA-IR when adjusted for age, BM or BMI;
(4) Taking VPA ≥ 60 min/w had no effect on HOMA-IR when adjusted for %BF or ACi;
Loprinzi et al., 2012 [42] cross-sectional 535 ACC: n/r
Volume (min/d) of MVPA
MS Regression: adjusted for age, race and smoking
(1) MVPA was favorably associated with the odds of being MS;
Macena et al., 2021 [43] cross-sectional 58 ACC: ActivPAL; triaxial
Sitting/lying down (1.25 METs), Standing (1.4 METs), Walking 120 steps/min (4 METs) (h/d)
Steps/d
HOMA-IR ANOVA:
(1) Sitting/lying down, standing, walking, and steps/d had no association with HOMA-IR;
Panton et al., 2007 [44] cross-sectional 35 PED: Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200, sealed
Steps (n/d)
SBP, DBP; HbA1c, TC, HDL, LDL, TG, CRP ANOVA:
(1) Group (Steps/d < 5000) had lower TC, LDL compared to Group (Steps/d ≥ 5000);
(2) No differences in SBP, DBP, HbA1c, HDL, TG, CRP between Groups.
Slater et al., 2021 [45] cross-sectional 275 ACC: ActiGraph w-GT3X, Acti-Watch; triaxial
Volume (min/d) of MVPA
TPA (cpm/d)
HbA1c, FPG, HOMA-IR, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, SBP, DBP, Fasting insulin, CRP Regression: adjusted for age, socioeconomic, %BF
(1) In Group (Pacific), TPA was positivelyunfavorably associated with SBP;
(2) In Group (European), TPA was unfavorably associated with HbA1c and CRP;
(3) In Group (Pacific), MVPA was unfavorably associated with fasting insulin;
(4) In Group (European), MVPA was favorably associated with HDL and HOMA-IR, unfavorably associated with fasting insulin and CRP;
(5) In all, TPA was unfavorably associated with CRP and fasting insulin; MVPA was favorably associated with HOMA-IR and HDL, unfavorably associated with CRP and fasting insulin.
Tabozzi et al., 2020 [46] cross-sectional 13 ACC: ActiGraph GT3X + BT; triaxial
%Volume: LPA, MPA, VPA
Volume (min/d) of MVPA
Steps (n/d)
FPG, PPG Regression: adjusted for age, SB
(1) MVPA was favorably associated with peak PPG;
Correlation:
(1) %LPA, %MPA, %VPA, MVPA, steps had no association with FPG;
(2)%MPA, %VPA, MVPA were negatively associated with PPG;
(3)%LPA and Steps had no association with PPG;
Vella et al., 2011 [47] cross-sectional 60 ACC: Actigraph GT1M; uniaxial
meeting/not meeting MVPA (30 min/d)
FPG, Fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, TC, HDL, LDL, TG, CRP, SBP, DBP t-test:
(1) Meeting MVPA guidelines had favorable effects on TC and TG;
Vella et al., 2009 [48] cross-sectional 60 ACC: Actigraph GT1M; uniaxial
Steps (n/d)
FPG, HDL, TG, SBP, DBP correlation:
(1) Steps/d were favorably associated with FPG;
Regression: adjusted for age, FFM, FM
(1) Steps/d were favorably associated with HDL and TG;
Zając-Gawlak et al., 2017 [49] cross-sectional 85 ACC: ActiGraph GT1M; uniaxial
Steps (n/d)
MS U test:
(1) Group (Steps/d ≥ 12500) had lower number of MS criteria than Group (10,000–12,500) and Group(<10,000);
(2) No differences in the number of MS between Group (10,000–12,500) and Group(<10,000);
Odds ratios:
Group (Steps/d ≥ 12500) had 3.84 times lower risk of being MS than Group (Steps/d < 12,500);

Note: ACC, accelerometer; ACi, abdominal circumference; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FFM, fat-free mass; FPG, fasting glucose; FM, fat mass; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IL-6, interleukin-6; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LPA, low-intensity physical activity; METs, metabolic equivalents; MHO, metabolically healthy overweight/obese; MPA, moderate-intensity physical activity; MS, metabolic syndrome; MUO, metabolically unhealthy overweight/obese; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; PA, physical activity; PED, pedometer; PPG, postprandial glucose; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TNF-alpha, tumor necrosis factor-α; TPA, total physical activity; U-test, Mann–Whitney U-test; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; VPA, vigorous physical activity.