Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):834. doi: 10.3390/biom12060834

Table 2.

Analysis of variance of a quadratic optimization model for EPS production by thermophilic B. haynesii CamB6.

Source Sum of Squares Degree of Freedom Mean Square F-Value p-Value (Prob > F)
Model 70.99278 14 5.07091286 225.6301761 <0.0001 ***
A-glucose 4.3010667 1 4.30106667 191.3758837 <0.0001 ***
B-yeast extract 9.3250667 1 9.32506667 414.9186731 <0.0001 ***
C-pH 12.126817 1 12.1268167 539.5824888 <0.0001 ***
D-inoculum size 3.0104167 1 3.01041667 133.9484353 <0.0001 ***
AB 4.305625 1 4.305625 191.5787067 <0.0001 ***
AC 5.1984 1 5.1984 231.3027142 <0.0001 ***
AD 0.9216 1 0.9216 41.00657537 <0.0001 ***
BC 6.5536 1 6.5536 291.6023137 <0.0001 ***
BD 0.4356 1 0.4356 19.38201414 0.0005 **
CD 0.075625 1 0.075625 3.36493301 0.0865 **
A^2 9.1806298 1 9.18062976 408.4919556 <0.0001 ***
B^2 5.957344 1 5.95734405 265.0719159 <0.0001 ***
C^2 14.260144 1 14.260144 634.5048521 <0.0001 ***
D^2 0.0316298 1 0.03162976 1.407365685 0.2539
Lack of Fit 0.2910333 10 0.02910333 3.157685353 0.1081
Residual 0.3371167 15 0.02247444
Pure Error 0.0460833 5 0.00921667
Cor Total 71.329897 29
Std. Dev. 0.1499148
Mean 2.6963333
C.V. % 5.5599502
PRESS 1.742712
R-Squared 0.9952738
Adj R-Squared 0.9908627
Pred R-Squared 0.9755682
Adeq Precision 58.298716

Where ** = not significant, and *** = significant