Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;14(12):3031. doi: 10.3390/cancers14123031

Table 2.

Multivariable Cox regression of loco–regional tumour control for the 2-metagene signature, treatment, their interaction term, and relevant clinical parameters for the pooled matched dataset (n = 216). Significant p-values are marked in bold.

Parameter Coefficient (ß) Loco–Regional Control
HR (95 % CI)
p-Value
2-Gene signature
Gene classifier (high vs. low risk [b]) 1.22 3.42 (1.47–7.97) 0.004
Treatment status (PORT-C vs. PORT [b]) −0.30 0.74 (0.35–1.58) 0.44
Gene classifier × Treatment status −1.73 0.18 (0.04–0.82) 0.027
2-Gene signature and clinical parameters
Gene classifier (high vs. low risk [b]) 1.19 3.29 (1.37–7.91) 0.007
Treatment status (PORT-C vs. PORT [b]) −0.57 0.56 (0.24–1.33) 0.19
Gene classifier × Treatment status −1.81 0.16 (0.03–0.78) 0.023
T stage (3, 4 vs. 1, 2 [b]) 0.99 2.68 (1.33–5.40) 0.005
Tumour localization (oral cavity vs. others [b]) 0.58 1.79 (0.88–3.64) 0.11
N stage (2, 3 vs. 0, 1 [b]) 0.38 1.46 (0.65–3.27) 0.36
R status (1 vs. 0 [b]) 0.40 1.49 (0.69–3.30) 0.33
ECE status (1 vs. 0 [b]) 0.48 1.61 (0.66–3.92) 0.29
p16 overexpression (1 vs. 0 [b]) −0.97 0.38 (0.15–0.94) 0.037

[b] Baseline class.