Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;29(6):3870–3880. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29060309

Table 3.

Physicians’ responses to the survey described in proportion.

Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6
The quality of the image (focus, visual resolution, magnification) was acceptable. 0 0 0 40 40 20
The quality of the audio was acceptable. 0 0 12 18 47 24
I could accurately assess audible symptoms. 10 15 10 40 20 5
The telemedicine clinical exam provided sufficient information. 25 20 25 15 15 0
I am confident in my assessment. 0 0 6 61 33 0
Technical difficulties made this process too time-consuming. 0 20 40 15 20 5
Using telemedicine takes longer than a face-to-face consult. 30 35 10 25 0 0
Overall, the system was accessible and easy to use. 5 0 15 25 35 20
Telemedicine improves clinical efficiency. 5 11 26 42 16 0
My communication with the patient was unimpaired by telemedicine. 0 15 10 30 40 5
I was unable to observe details of the patient’s facial expression and body movements that would have been important in connecting with him/her. 0 40 20 35 5 0
The doctor–patient rapport was unimpaired by the use of telemedicine. 0 16 11 47 26 0
I would have preferred to see this patient in person. 0 30 25 20 10 15

1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = somewhat disagree, 4 = somewhat agree, 5 = agree, and 6 = strongly agree.