Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;12(6):1328. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061328

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of each subgroup of CVM.

CVM Type References Diagnostic Yield
(95% CI)
Any CVM [91,92,94,97,98,99,100,101,103,104,106] 5.79% (5.54–6.04)
CTD [91,103,106] 15.93% (15.75–16.11)
TOF [92,98,99,100,101,104] 11.28% (9.7–12.86)
LVOTD [91,103,106] 6.67% (5.51–7.83)
HLHS [92,98,99,100,104] 6.52% (5.64–7.4)
D-TGA [93,98,99,104] 6.49% (5.26–7.72)
RAA [98,99,103,104,105] 4.42% (2.36–6.48)
VSD [89,91,96,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,106] 2.64% (2.26–3.02)
ARSA [95,99,105] 0.66% (0.62–0.7)

ARSA: aberrant right subclavian artery; CTD: conotruncal defect; CVM: cardiovascular malformation; D-TGA: dextro-transposition of the great arteries; HLHS: hypoplastic left heart syndrome; LVOTD: left ventricular outflow tract defect; RAA: right aortic arch; TOF: tetralogy of Fallot; VSD: ventricular septal defect.