Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Ind Eng Chem Res. 2021 Oct 27;60(44):15874–15884. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02868

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Depiction of the ElectroPen device including its parts, (b) comparison against a commercial electroporator, (c) source of the piezoelectric crystal in a lighter, (d) an image of the ePatch vaccine delivery platform,18 (e) image of ePatch compared to traditional syringe needles for scale, and (f/g) images of the microneedle electrode array. (h) While both approaches rely on electric pulses, the difference lies in the use of piezoelectricity enabling frugal hardware, compared to traditional capacitance discharge. [Panels (a–c) were reproduced (or adapted) with permission from ref 15. Copyright 2020, PLOS Biology. Panels (d–g) were reproduced (or adapted) with permission from ref 18. Copyright 2021, PNAS.]