Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127127

Table 7.

Description of maternal physical activity, newborn body composition assessment and timing, and summary of key findings.

Randomized Control Trial
Authors, Year, Ref. Description of Maternal PA * Newborn Body Comp. ASMT ** ASMT
Timing ***
Key Findings Body Comp.Diff. at Birth
Barakat et al., 2009 [17] Resistance Training 3×/w PI At birth No sig. assoc. between training women and infant outcomes. Control women’s pre-pregnancy weight positively assoc. with infant birthweight. No
Bisson et al., 2015 [18] Aerobics 3×/w; Resistance Training 3×/w;
Accelerometer;
PPAQ
SF w/n 72 h of birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between the training and control group. No
Clapp et al., 2000 [19] Aerobics 3×/w SF
PI
TBEC
At birth
TBEC at 5 days
Infants were sig. heavier, longer, and had more lean mass in the exercise group compared to the control group. All other infant outcomes not sig. diff. No
Clapp et al., 2002 [20] Aerobics 3–5×/w SF
PI
TBEC
At birth
TBEC at 5 days
Infants with moms who slowly increased exercise volume from first trimester (low) to third (high) were sig. smaller (smaller birth weight, smaller PI, body fat percent, fat mass and lean mass) than those infants whose moms started the first trimester with a high volume and decreased volume throughout pregnancy (high–low). Yes
Clark et al., 2019 [21] Aerobics 3×/w;
MPAQ;
HR monitoring
PI
BMI
Abd. Cir.
At birth Pre-pregnancy PA levels sig. assoc. with PI and BMI. Infant head circumference in the exercise group significantly larger than infants in the control group. No
Garnaes et al., 2017 [22] Aerobics 3×/w;
Resistance Training 2×/w
SF
Abd. Cir.
At birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between exercise and control group. No
Hoffman et al., 2019 [23] PPAQ BMI At birth Women who were more active in late pregnancy sig. assoc. with a larger infant birthweight. No
Hopkins et al., 2010 [24] Aerobics 5×/w;
HR monitoring
DXA
PI
BMI
w/n 48 h of birth
DXA at 17 days
15 w exercise program during later pregnancy assoc. with reduced birth weights, but there were equal reductions in FM/FFM to account for the difference in weight, not just fat mass reductions, between the exercise and control groups. BMI sig. lower at birth in exercise vs. control; however, PI was not sig. diff. No
Seneviratne et al., 2017 [25] PPAQ;
Aerobics 3–5×/w
DXA
PI
w/n 2 w of birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between the exercise and control group. No
Seneviratne et al., 2016 [26] Aerobics 3–5×/w PI
BMI
At birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between exercise and control groups. No
Sklempe Kokic et al., 2018 [27] PPAQ;
Aerobics 2×/w;
Resistance Training 2×/w
PI At birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between the exercise and control group No
Trak-Fellermeier et al., 2019 [28] Accelerometer SF
PI
Abd. Cir.
w/n one week No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between the exercise and control group. SF data not presented No
Van Poppel, et al., 2019 [29] Aerobics 2×/w;
PPAQ;
Interview
SF
Abd. Cir.
w/n 48 h of birth No sig. diff. in infant outcomes between exercise and control group. No

* Description of maternal physical activity (PA); times per week (x/w); pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ); modifiable physical activity questionnaire (MPAQ); heart rate (HR); ** Newborn body composition (Comp.) assessment (ASMT); ponderal index (PI); skin fold (SF); total body electrical conductivity (TBEC); body mass index (BMI); dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) abdominal circumference (Abd. Cir.); *** Assessment (ASTM) timing; within (w/n); hours (h).