Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;19(12):7040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127040

Table 4.

The structural model’s results.

Hypotheses Beta
(β)		 C-R
(T-Value)		 R2 Results of Hypotheses
H1 Job Insecurity graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg UPoB 0.29 *** 4.323 Supported
H2 Job Insecurity graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg Turnover intention 0.33 *** 7.175 Supported
H3 Distributive injustice graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg Job Insecurity 0.37 *** 8.443 Supported
H4 Distributive injustice graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg Turnover intention 0.42 *** 9.789 Supported
H5 Distributive injustice graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg UPoB 0.38 *** 8.971 Supported
H6 Turnover intention graphic file with name ijerph-19-07040-i001.jpg UPoB 0.51 *** 12.154 Supported
H7 Job Insecurity Inline graphic Turnover intention Inline graphic UPoB Path 1: β =0.33 ***
t-value = 7.175
Path 2: β = 0.51 ***
t-value = 12.154		 Supported
H8 Distributive injustice Inline graphic Job Insecurity Inline graphic UPoB Path 1: β =0.37 ***
t-value =8.443
Path 2: β = 0.29 ***
t-value = 4.323		 Supported
Turnover intention 0.30
UPoB 0.50

Model GoF: χ2 (164, N = 650) =783.756, p < 0.001, normed χ2 = 4.779, RMSEA = 0.039, SRMR = 0.0370, CFI = 0.916, TLI = 0.926, NFI = 0.917, PCFI = 0.707 and PNFI = 0.701. *** p < 0.001.