Table 3.

RoBis, risk of bias for systematic reviews [18].

Review Year Country	PHASE 2				PHASE 3
	1. Study Eligibility Criteria	2. Identification and Selection of Studies	3. Data Collection and Study Appraisal	4. Synthesis and Findings	Risk of Bias in the Review
van der Windt et al. (1999) [21] The Netherlands
Struijs et al. (2002) [22] Australia
Green et al. (2002) [23] Australia
Borkholder et al. (2004) [24] USA
Trudel et al. (2004) [25] Canada
Buchbinder et al. (2004) [26] Australia
Bisset et al. (2005) [27] Australia
Herd (2008) [28] The Netherlands
Barr et al. (2009) [29] UK
Coombes et al. (2010) [30] Australia
Tumilty et al. (2010) [31] New Zealand
Kalichman et al. (2011) [32] Israel
Buchbinder at al. (2011) [33] Australia
Raman et al. (2012) [34] Canada
Ahmad et al. (2013) [35] UK
Pattanittum et al. (2013) [36] Australia
Cullinane et al. (2014) [37] New Zealand
Tang et al. (2015) [38] China
Tsikopoulos et al. (2016) [39] Greece
Mattie et al. (2017) [40] USA
Burn et al. (2017) [41] USA
Lucado et al. (2018) [42] USA
Lin et al. (2018) [43] Taiwan
Navarro-Santana et al. (2020) [44] Spain
Karanasios et al. (2021) [45] Greece