TABLE 2.
Longitudinal Association Between Coronary Calcium Score and Development of SOFA Scores Over Time
| Model | Regression Coefficient (95% CI) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Crude | ||
| Tertile 1, degree of CAC in the study population | Reference category | |
| Tertile 2, degree of CAC in the study population | 0.9 (−0.4 to 2.1) | 0.189 |
| Tertile 3, degree of CAC in the study population | 1.8 (0.6-3.1) | 0.005 |
| Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for age and sex, APACHE-II score | ||
| Tertile 1, degree of CAC in the study population | Reference category | |
| Tertile 2, degree of CAC in the study population | 0.7 (−0.5 to 1.9) | 0.241 |
| Tertile 3, degree of CAC in the study population | 1.4 (0.1-2.7) | 0.042 |
| Model 3: Model 2 adjusted for cardiovascular risk (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking, diabetes mellitus type 2) | ||
| Tertile 1, degree of CAC in the study population | Reference category | |
| Tertile 2, degree of CAC in the study population | 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.7) | 0.463 |
| Tertile 3, degree of CAC in the study population | 1.3 (−0.0 to 2.7) | 0.059 |
| Model 4: Model 3 adjusted for liver conditions, chronic lung disease, and chronic kidney conditions | ||
| Tertile 1, degree of CAC in the study population | Reference | |
| Tertile 2, degree of CAC in the study population | 0.4 (−0.8 to 1.7) | 0.482 |
| Tertile 3, degree of CAC in study population | 1.3 (−0.2 to 2.7) | 0.085 |
CI indicates confidence interval.