Table 2.
Comparison between randomization orders.
| Randomization Order Group | M (SD) | F (1,18) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAM_V_T1 | 1 2 |
3.5 (1.1) 2.8 (1.5) |
1.47 | ns |
| SAM_A_T1 | 1 2 |
5.2 (2.4) 7.2 (1.9) |
4.13 | ns |
| SAM_D_T1 | 1 2 |
4.8 (2.2) 6.2 (1.7) |
2.55 | ns |
| VAS_RELAX_T1 | 1 2 |
7.8 (1.6) 8.2 (1.1) |
0.43 | ns |
| VAS_PRESENCE_T1 | 1 2 |
6.6 (2.4) 7.9 (2.1) |
1.67 | ns |
| SAM_V_T2 | 1 2 |
2.4 (0.8) 2.1 (1.3) |
0.64 | ns |
| SAM_A_T2 | 1 2 |
5.8 (2.7) 7.4 (2.1) |
2.22 | ns |
| SAM_D_T2 | 1 2 |
5.6 (1.7) 6.4 (1.7) |
1.18 | ns |
| VAS_RELAX_T2 | 1 2 |
7.6 (0.9) 8.4 (0.9) |
2.95 | ns |
| VAS_PRESENCE_T2 | 1 2 |
7.6 (0.9) 8.4 (0.9) |
3.43 | ns |
| STAI-Y1_T1 | 1 2 |
28.2 (7.6) 27.1 (4.5) |
0.16 | ns |
| STAI-Y1_T2 | 1 2 |
25.2 (3.9) 25.6 (4.7) |
0.04 | ns |
| REALISM_T1 | 1 2 |
100.2 (14.3) 103.2 (19.8) |
0.15 | ns |
| REALISM_T2 | 1 2 |
105.1 (17.5) 108.6 (12.9) |
0.26 | ns |
| ENGAGEMENT_T1 | 1 2 |
10.9 (2.2) 10.6 (2.9) |
0.07 | ns |
| ENGAGEMENT_T2 | 1 2 |
10.3 (2.9) 12.3 (1.4) |
3.82 | ns |
| IMMERSIVITY_T1 | 1 2 |
11.8 (5.5) 13.9 (3.1) |
1.81 | ns |
| IMMERSIVITY_T2 | 1 2 |
17.2 (1.5) 16.1 (2.4) |
1.11 | ns |
| USABILITY_T1 | 1 2 |
17.1 (3.1) 14.1 (3.7) |
3.86 | ns |
| USABILITY_T2 | 1 2 |
16.5 (3.5) 15.1 (3.4) |
0.82 | ns |
| EMOTIONAL STATE_T1 | 1 2 |
46.7 (7.5) 43.8 (8.4) |
0.66 | ns |
| EMOTIONAL STATE_T2 | 1 2 |
45.7 (7.1) 47.3 (6.1) |
0.30 | ns |
Notes: Rand. order group = 1 (standard VRE before/personalized VRE after), 2 (personalized VRE before/standard VRE after); M (SD) = Mean (Standard Deviation); p = p-value; SAM_V = Self-Assessment Manikin_Valence; SAM_A = Self-Assessment Manikin_Arousal; SAM_D = Self-Assessment Manikin_Dominance/Control; VAS = Visual Analogue Scale; STAI-Y2 = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y2 (regarding trait anxiety features); STAI-Y1 = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y1 (regarding state-anxiety features).