Table 3.
The effects of cueing on proportions and pupil size in the control experiment
| Proportions | Pupil size | |
|---|---|---|
| Modulation index: no cue vs. cueing |
t(9) = 5.66* p < 0.001 logBF = 2.04 |
t(9) = 0.66 p = 0.52 logBF = −0.43 |
| 25% contrast increment vs cueing |
t(9) = 5.46* p < 0.001 logBF = 1.95 |
t(9) = 0.41 p = 0.69 logBF = −0.48 |
| 50% contrast increment vs cueing |
t(9) = 2.43* p = 0.04 logBF = 0.33 |
t(9) = 0.52 p = 0.61 logBF = −0.45 |
| 100% contrast increment vs cueing |
t(9) = 0.77 p = 0.46 logBF = −0.40 |
t(9) = 3.29* p = 0.01 logBF = 0.81 |
| 150% contrast increment vs cueing |
t(9) = 3.83* p = 0.004 logBF = 1.11 |
t(9) = 4.73* p = 0.001 logBF = 1.58 |
Modulation indices from the control experiment: comparison of attention cueing versus no cue (first row) and attention cueing versus contrast enhancement by 25%, 50%, 100%, and 150%. * for p < 0.05 or lower.