Table 2.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | −0.014 | −0.018 | −0.076 | −0.091 * |
Country | −0.068 | −0.060 | −0.038 | −0.047 |
Training level | 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.003 | 0.009 |
Type of settlement | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.004 | −0.004 |
Mother’s education level | −0.070 | −0.062 | −0.078 | −0.076 |
Father’s education level | 0.024 | 0.030 | 0.037 | 0.039 |
Mother’s employment | 0.102 * | 0.096 * | 0.082 * | 0.082 * |
Father’s employment | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Family’s objective financial situation | −0.005 | −0.002 | −0.013 | −0.020 |
Own objective financial situation | 0.074 | 0.080 | 0.065 | 0.069 |
Family’s subjective financial situation | 0.054 | 0.056 | 0.032 | 0.025 |
Own subjective financial situation | −0.017 | −0.008 | −0.006 | 0.002 |
Coping | −0.079 | −0.148 * | −0.132 * | |
Trust | −0.004 | −0.009 | 0.002 | |
Satisfaction (communication, guidance, talent management) | 0.042 | 0.065 | 0.082 | |
Satisfaction (leisure time opportunities) | 0.100 * | 0.055 | 0.067 | |
Satisfaction (support) | −0.075 * | −0.074 | −0.085 * | |
Satisfaction (teaching quality | −0.099 * | −0.055 | −0.037 | |
Satisfaction (infrastructure) | 0.027 | 0.002 | −0.013 | |
Sport persistence | 0.308 *** | 0.302 *** | ||
Sporting frequency | 0.040 | 0.051 | ||
Practical sport embeddedness | 0.035 | 0.031 | ||
Intergenerational integration | −0.007 | −0.001 | ||
Intragenerational integration | −0.030 | −0.029 | ||
Intragenerational disintegration | −0.069 | −0.068 | ||
Practice-oriented mixed peer orientation | 0.050 | 0.047 | ||
Culture-oriented mixed peer orientation | 0.008 | 0.017 | ||
Academic persistence | −0.103 * | |||
R | 0.157 | 0.240 | 0.409 | 0.418 |
R square | 0.025 | 0.057 | 0.167 | 0.175 |
Adjusted R square | 0.005 | 0.027 | 0.128 | 0.135 |
*: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001, tendency-level differences (0.05 < p < 0.1) are marked with yellow; Gender: 1 = male, 0 = female; Country: 1 = Hungary, 0 = other; Level of education: 1 = MA/MSc, 0 = BA/BSc; Type of settlement: 1 = larger city/county seat/capital, 0 = smaller city/village/farm; Mother’s/Father’s education level: 1 = higher education (at least bachelor), 0 = primary or secondary education; Mother’s/Father’s employment: 1 = employed, 0 = not employed; Family’s/Own objective financial status: 1 = above average, 0 = below average; Family’s/Own subjective financial status: 1 = above average, 0 = below average; the other variables are scales.