Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2022 Jun 11;11(12):3360. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123360

The Association between General Anesthesia and New Postoperative Uses of Sedative–Hypnotics: A Nationwide Matched Cohort Study

Chen-Yu Tai 1,2,, Hsin-Yi Liu 1,2,, Juan P Cata 3, Ying-Xiu Dai 4,5, Mu-Hong Chen 5,6, Jui-Tai Chen 1,2, Tzeng-Ji Chen 5,7,8, Hsiang-Ling Wu 5,9, Yih-Giun Cherng 1,2, Chun-Cheng Li 1,2, Chien-Wun Wang 1,2,*, Ying-Hsuan Tai 1,2,*
Editor: Tomoyuki Kawamata
PMCID: PMC9224548  PMID: 35743431

Abstract

Sedative–hypnotic misuse is associated with psychiatric diseases and overdose deaths. It remains uncertain whether types of anesthesia affect the occurrence of new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics (NPUSH). We used reimbursement claims data of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance and conducted propensity score matching to compare the risk of NPUSH between general and neuraxial anesthesia among surgical patients who had no prescription of oral sedative–hypnotics or diagnosis of sleep disorders within the 12 months before surgery. The primary outcome was NPUSH within 180 days after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 92,222 patients were evaluated after matching. Among them, 15,016 (16.3%) had NPUSH, and 2183 (4.7%) were made a concomitant diagnosis of sleep disorders. General anesthesia was significantly associated both with NPUSH (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13–1.22, p < 0.0001) and NPUSH with sleep disorders (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02–1.21, p = 0.0212) compared with neuraxial anesthesia. General anesthesia was also linked to NPUSH that occurred 90–180 days after surgery (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06–1.19, p = 0.0002). Other risk factors for NPUSH were older age, female, lower insurance premium, orthopedic surgery, specific coexisting diseases (e.g., anxiety disorder), concurrent medications (e.g., systemic steroids), postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and admission to an intensive care unit. Patients undergoing general anesthesia had an increased risk of NPUSH compared with neuraxial anesthesia. This finding may provide an implication in risk stratification and prevention for sedative–hypnotic dependence after surgery.

Keywords: anxiolytic, benzodiazepine, risk factor, sleep disorder, sleep disturbance

1. Introduction

Sedative–hypnotic misuse is a growing public health problem, affecting about 2–3% of the adult population worldwide [1,2]. Epidemiological study has shown that benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (i.e., zopiclone and zolpidem) were the third most commonly misused drugs in the United States in 2017 [1,2]. Sedative–hypnotic misuse is associated with psychiatric disorders, impaired quality of life, and overdose deaths [3,4]. However, the initial source of sedative–hypnotics among long-term users remains poorly understood.

Mounting evidence has shown that surgery, general anesthesia, opioids, and pain may contribute to the development of postoperative sleep disturbances by disrupting the sleep/wake cycle and changing sleep architecture [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Opioids used in general anesthesia can significantly reduce the time percentage of deep sleep and induce or exacerbate both central and obstructive sleep apnea [6,7,8]. An animal model demonstrated that sevoflurane inhalation induced rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep deficits, delayed REM sleep recovery, and reduced latency to REM sleep [9]. In contrast, regional anesthesia reduces perioperative opioid consumption and alleviates postoperative pain, which may improve the sleep quality of surgical patients [7,10]. Nevertheless, some studies reported that sleep disturbances occur regardless of reduced opioid consumption and adequate pain relief among patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia [11,12,13].

Although both general and neuraxial anesthesia potentially relate to postoperative sleep disturbances, no study has compared the rates of postoperative sedative–hypnotic prescriptions between these two anesthetic techniques. Wright et al. recently reported that perioperative uses of benzodiazepines were associated with postoperative persistent uses of benzodiazepines, which may develop into long-term sedative–hypnotic misuse [14]. However, the perioperative influential factors for postoperative sedative–hypnotic uses are largely unknown.

We utilized Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) research database to conduct a nationwide population-based cohort study. There were two objectives in this study. First, we aimed to compare the risk of new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics (NPUSH) between general and neuraxial anesthesia in surgical patients. Second, we sought to evaluate the perioperative risk factors for NPUSH to identify potentially modifiable factors. This may provide important evidence in reducing postoperative sedative–hypnotic uses and preventing long-term misuse and its adverse effects among surgical patients. Based on the current evidence [5,6,7,8,9,10], we hypothesized that general anesthesia was associated with higher risks of NPUSH and new-onset sleep disorders compared with neuraxial anesthesia.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Source of Data

This study obtained the approval from the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University in Taiwan (TMU-JIRB-N202101005; data of approval on 7 January 2021). Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. All methods of this study were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations [15]. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program was launched in March 1995 and offered insurance to more than 99% of 23.5 million Taiwanese residents. The NHI research database contains comprehensive data of the insured beneficiaries, including demographic characteristics (e.g., date of birth and sex) and claims data (e.g., medical diagnoses, prescription drugs, interventional or diagnostic procedures, and medical expenditures). The NHI research data have been broadly used in epidemiological studies [16,17,18]. This study used three Longitudinal Health Insurance Databases (LHID2000, LHID2005, and LHID2010), which randomly sampled 1 million people from the original NHI research database in the years 2000, 2005, and 2010, respectively. The representativeness of LHIDs has been validated by Taiwan’s National Health Research Institutes [19].

2.2. Patient Selection

We used the medical claims of 3 million insured individuals to select patients who were aged ≥20 years and underwent their first surgery requiring general or neuraxial anesthesia from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2013. We excluded surgeries that could only be performed with general anesthesia, surgeries with a length of hospital stay < 2 days, patients who were prescribed any oral sedative–hypnotics or had any diagnoses of sleep disorders within 12 months before the index surgery, and patients who died within 180 days after the index surgery. Oral sedative–hypnotics included benzodiazepine drugs (diazepam, chloradiazepoxide, lorazepam, bromazepam, alprazolam, medazepam, oxazepam, fludiazepam, oxazolam, nitrazepam, flunitrazepam, lorametazepam, estazolam, triazolam, brotizolam, midazolam, nimetazepam, flurazepam, and clonazepam) and non-benzodiazepine drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem). Each patient with general anesthesia was randomly matched to a patient with neuraxial anesthesia, using a frequency-matched-pair procedure [20].

2.3. Study Outcome

The primary outcome was NPUSH within 180 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were NPUSH with a concomitant diagnosis of sleep disorders within 180 days after surgery, NPUSH which occurred 90–180 days after surgery, and NPUSH within 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 days after surgery. We identified patients who had a postoperative diagnosis of sleep disorder using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes [21] (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4. Patient and Clinical Characteristics

Insurance premium was classified into $0–$500, $501–$800, and > $800 United States dollars per month. Surgeries were classified into orthopedic (lower extremity), genitourinary, anorectal, obstetric (including cesarean section), and hernia repair surgeries. The ICD-9-CM codes of physicians’ diagnoses within 24 months prior to surgery were used to ascertain the following coexisting diseases, chosen based on data availability, physiological plausibility, and the existing literature: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, malignancy, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder [22] (Supplementary Table S1). Lifestyle factors included obesity, smoking disorder, alcohol-use disorder, other substance-use disorder, and malnutrition [22]. The numbers of hospitalizations and emergency visits within 24 months before the index surgery were examined to reflect patients’ overall health and to avoid ascertainment bias. We also evaluated the requirements for blood transfusion (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, or platelets) [23,24] and intensive care during the index surgical admission. Major complications that occurred within 30 days after the index surgery were analyzed, including pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac dysrhythmias, and postoperative bleeding. The analyses also adjusted for the concurrent medications prescribed within 180 days after the surgery which might cause sleep disorders, including systemic steroids, ephedrine, theophylline, diuretics, and anti-depressants [25]. Diuretics included furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, spironolactone, and chlorothiazide. Anti-depressants were comprised of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, and escitalopram) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine and duloxetine).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized using mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. A non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate a propensity score for subjects undergoing general or neuraxial anesthesia. We matched each patient with general anesthesia to a patient with neuraxial anesthesia using a greedy matching algorithm within a tolerance limit of 0.05 and without replacement to balance the distributions of age, sex, insurance premium, types of surgery, coexisting diseases, lifestyle factors, concurrent medications, numbers of hospitalizations and emergency visits before surgery, postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and admission to intensive care units (ICU) between the two groups [20]. The distributions of baseline patient characteristics were compared between matched pairs by using the standardized difference [26]. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for all included variables and to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcome of interest. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the cumulative incidence of NPUSH within 180 days after surgery between the groups. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by age, sex, coexisting diseases, concurrent medications, postoperative complications, blood transfusions, and admission to the ICU. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding patients who had a history of anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, alcohol-use disorder, other substance-use disorder, or uses of anti-depressants (Analysis I), excluding patients with a history of malignancy (Analysis II), and excluding patients with perioperative uses of blood transfusion, postoperative complications, or ICU admission (Analysis III). We considered a two-sided level of 0.05 statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were conducted using Statistics Analysis System (SAS), Version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Patient Characteristics

The patient selection and matching process generated 46,111 matched pairs for analysis. (Figure 1) Table 1 shows the baseline patient characteristics. Notably, the distributions of demographics, types of surgery, coexisting diseases, lifestyle factors, concurrent medications, number of hospitalizations, number of emergency room visits, postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and admissions to ICUs were well balanced after matching.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram for patient selection.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing general and neuraxial anesthesia.

GA
n = 46,111
NA
n = 46,111
SDD
Age (years), mean (SD) 50.0 18.2 50.0 18.7 <0.0001
Sex, male, n (%) 25,607 55.5 25,544 55.4 0.0030
Insurance premium (USD/month), n (%) −0.0004
  0–500 18,408 39.9 18,477 40.1
  501–800 15,470 33.6 15,319 33.2
  ≥801 12,233 26.5 12,315 26.7
Type of surgery, n (%)
  Orthopedic, lower extremity 18,915 41.0 18,957 41.1 −0.0021
  Genitourinary 11,906 25.8 11,821 25.6 0.0053
  Anorectal 5545 12.0 5434 11.8 0.0127
  Obstetric 5968 12.9 5957 12.9 0.0012
  Hernia repair 3924 8.5 4108 8.9 −0.0277
Coexisting diseases, n (%)
  Hypertension 11,001 23.9 11,013 23.9 −0.0008
  Diabetes mellitus 5304 11.5 5341 11.6 −0.0043
  Ischemic heart disease 3248 7.0 3280 7.1 −0.0058
  Atherosclerosis 272 0.6 261 0.6 0.0229
  Heart failure 948 2.1 943 2.1 0.0030
  Cerebrovascular disease 2482 5.4 2460 5.3 0.0052
  Chronic kidney disease 1592 3.5 1551 3.4 0.0149
  COPD 2829 6.1 2889 6.3 −0.0123
  Malignancy 2349 5.1 2436 5.3 −0.0211
  Anxiety disorder 1725 3.7 1716 3.7 0.0030
  Depressive disorder 93 0.2 100 0.2 −0.0401
  Schizophrenia 80 0.2 77 0.2 0.0211
  Bipolar disorder 30 0.1 33 0.1 −0.0526
Lifestyle factors, n (%)
  Obesity 230 0.5 228 0.5 0.0048
  Smoking disorder 278 0.6 279 0.6 −0.0020
  Alcohol-use disorder 414 0.9 409 0.9 0.0068
  Other substance-use disorder 8 0.02 8 0.02 0
  Malnutrition 241 0.5 230 0.5 0.0259
  Concurrent medications, n (%)
  Systemic steroids 6725 14.6 6703 14.5 0.0021
  Ephedrine 7302 15.8 7444 16.1 −0.0126
  Theophylline 3753 8.1 3827 8.3 −0.0117
  Diuretics 3867 8.4 3883 8.4 −0.0025
  Anti-depressants 356 0.8 360 0.8 −0.0062
Number of hospitalizations, n (%) 0.0090
  0 37,741 81.9 37,926 82.3
  1 6085 13.2 5971 13.0
  2 1492 3.2 1412 3.1
  ≥3 793 1.7 802 1.7
Number of ER visits, n (%) −0.0096
  0 28,625 62.1 28,500 61.8
  1 10,797 23.4 10,769 23.4
  2 3855 8.4 3892 8.4
  ≥3 2834 6.2 2950 6.4
Blood transfusion, n (%) 560 1.2 487 1.1 0.0779
Postoperative complications, n (%) 5126 11.1 5422 11.8 −0.0349
ICU admission, n (%) 276 0.6 251 0.5 0.0526

Abbreviation: COPD = chronic obstruction pulmonary disease; ER = emergency room; GA = general anesthesia; ICU = intensive care unit; NA = neuraxial anesthesia; SD = standard deviation; SDD = standardized difference; USD = United States dollar.

3.2. New Postoperative Uses of Sedative–Hypnotics

In the postoperative 180-day period, 15,016 patients (16.3%) had NPUSH and 2183 (4.7%) had a concomitant diagnosis of sleep disorders. Table 2 shows the results of univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses for NPUSH. General anesthesia was significantly associated with a higher risk of NPUSH compared with neuraxial anesthesia (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13–1.22, p < 0.0001; absolute risk difference: 0.024, 95% CI: 0.017–0.030; Figure 2). The time to NPUSH was median 47 days (interquartile range: 19–100) for patients with general anesthesia and 44 (16–103) for those with neuraxial anesthesia. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results: Analysis I (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.14–1.23, p < 0.0001), Analysis II (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12–1.21, p < 0.0001), and Analysis III (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.13–1.22, p < 0.0001). In addition, general anesthesia was associated with increased NPUSH with sleep disorders (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02–1.21, p = 0.0212). General anesthesia was also linked to NPUSH which occurred 90–180 days after surgery (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06–1.19, p = 0.0002) (Table 3).

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariable analyses for new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics.

Univariate Multivariable
cOR 95% CI p aOR 95% CI p
GA vs. NA 1.15 1.11–1.19 <0.0001 1.17 1.13–1.22 <0.0001
Age (years) 1.03 1.02–1.03 <0.0001 1.01 1.01–1.01 <0.0001
Sex, male vs. female 0.85 0.83–0.89 <0.0001 0.80 0.76–0.83 <0.0001
Insurance premium (USD/month) <0.0001 <0.0001
  501–800 vs. 0–500 0.81 0.78–0.84 <0.0001 0.95 0.91–0.99 0.0008
  ≥801 vs. 0–500 0.50 0.47–0.52 <0.0001 0.79 0.74–0.83 <0.0001
Type of surgery
  Orthopedic, lower extremity 1.79 1.73–1.85 <0.0001 1.44 1.04–2.01 0.0303
  Genitourinary 1.04 1.00–1.08 0.0823 1.04 0.75–1.45 0.7960
  Anorectal 0.75 0.70–0.79 <0.0001 1.08 0.78–1.51 0.6460
  Obstetric 0.34 0.31–0.36 <0.0001 0.50 0.36–0.71 <0.0001
  Hernia repair 0.64 0.59–0.69 <0.0001 0.79 0.57–1.10 0.1610
Coexisting diseases
  Hypertension 1.81 1.74–1.88 <0.0001 0.96 0.92–1.01 0.1280
  Diabetes mellitus 1.67 1.59–1.75 <0.0001 1.06 1.00–1.12 0.0555
  Ischemic heart disease 1.91 1.80–2.02 <0.0001 1.15 1.07–1.23 <0.0001
  Atherosclerosis 2.16 1.79–2.60 <0.0001 1.18 0.96–1.44 0.1142
  Heart failure 2.02 1.82–2.23 <0.0001 0.86 0.77–0.97 0.0122
  Cerebrovascular disease 1.77 1.66–1.90 <0.0001 0.93 0.86–1.00 0.0608
  Chronic kidney disease 1.64 1.51–1.79 <0.0001 0.95 0.86–1.04 0.2863
  COPD 1.82 1.71–1.93 <0.0001 1.10 1.02–1.18 0.0106
  Malignancy 1.62 1.51–1.74 <0.0001 1.22 1.13–1.31 <0.0001
  Anxiety disorder 1.82 1.68–1.97 <0.0001 1.46 1.34–1.59 <0.0001
  Depressive disorder 1.85 1.34–2.55 0.0002 1.02 0.70–1.47 0.9374
  Schizophrenia 2.41 1.72–3.37 <0.0001 1.85 1.28–2.67 0.0010
  Bipolar disorder 3.17 1.90–5.27 <0.0001 1.76 0.98–3.17 0.0586
Lifestyle factors
  Obesity 1.29 1.03–1.63 0.0274 1.16 0.91–1.48 0.2230
  Smoking disorder 1.00 0.80–1.26 0.9718 1.12 0.89–1.41 0.3489
  Alcohol-use disorder 1.82 1.56–2.13 <0.0001 1.75 1.48–2.06 <0.0001
  Other substance-use disorder 5.15 1.93–13.71 0.0011 4.95 1.78–13.72 0.0021
  Malnutrition 1.44 1.16–1.80 0.0010 0.93 0.73–1.18 0.5417
Concurrent medications
  Systemic steroids 2.32 2.22–2.42 <0.0001 1.81 1.73–1.89 <0.0001
  Ephedrine 1.27 1.21–1.33 <0.0001 1.31 1.24–1.37 <0.0001
  Theophylline 1.78 1.69–1.89 <0.0001 1.27 1.20–1.36 <0.0001
  Diuretics 3.13 2.97–3.29 <0.0001 1.88 1.77–1.99 <0.0001
  Anti-depressants 16.97 14.28–20.17 <0.0001 16.094 13.42–19.30 <0.0001
Number of hospitalizations <0.0001 0.7140
  1 vs. 0 1.24 1.18–1.31 0.0018 1.01 0.95–1.06 0.3104
  2 vs. 0 1.45 1.32–1.58 0.0577 0.98 0.88–1.08 0.9860
  ≥3 vs. 0 1.83 1.63–2.05 <0.0001 0.93 0.81–1.07 0.3301
Number of ER visits <0.0001 0.1101
  1 vs. 0 1.02 0.98–1.06 0.0003 0.98 0.93–1.02 0.4005
  2 vs. 0 1.02 0.96–1.09 0.0133 0.95 0.88–1.01 0.0635
  ≥3 vs. 0 1.35 1.26–1.44 <0.0001 1.06 0.98–1.14 0.0433
Blood transfusion 4.79 4.24–5.42 <0.0001 2.06 1.78–2.39 <0.0001
Postoperative complications 1.68 1.60–1.77 <0.0001 1.29 1.22–1.36 <0.0001
ICU admission 4.39 3.69–5.21 <0.0001 1.93 1.55–2.42 <0.0001

Abbreviation: aOR = adjusted odds ratio; COPD = chronic obstruction pulmonary disease; cOR = crude odds ratio; ER = emergency room; GA = general anesthesia; ICU = intensive care unit; NA = neuraxial anesthesia; USD = United States dollar.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cumulative incidence of new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics (NPUSH) between patients undergoing general and neuraxial anesthesia with number of subjects at risk.

Table 3.

New postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics for patients undergoing general or neuraxial anesthesia.

GA NA NPUSH risk
Event Rate (%) Event Rate (%) aOR (95% CI) p
All NPUSH 7938 17.2 7078 15.4 1.17 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NPUSH with sleep disorder 1135 2.5 1048 2.3 1.11 (1.02–1.21) 0.0212
30-day NPUSH 3011 6.5 2943 6.4 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.2527
60-day NPUSH 4587 10.0 4107 8.9 1.15 (1.10–1.20) <0.0001
90-day NPUSH 5640 12.2 4994 10.8 1.17 (1.12–1.22) <0.0001
120-day NPUSH 6539 14.2 5760 12.5 1.18 (1.14–1.23) <0.0001
150-day NPUSH 7279 15.8 6436 14.0 1.18 (1.14–1.23) <0.0001
90–180-day NPUSH 2338 5.1 2111 4.6 1.12 (1.06–1.19) 0.0002

Abbreviation: aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; GA = general anesthesia; NA = neuraxial anesthesia; NPUSH = new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics. Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, insurance premium (categorical), types of surgery, coexisting diseases, lifestyle factors, concurrent medications, number of hospitalizations, number of emergency room visits, perioperative uses of blood transfusion, postoperative complications, and intensive care unit care.

Other independent factors for NPUSH were age (aOR: 1.01), sex (male vs. female, aOR: 0.80), insurance premium ($501–800 USD/month vs. 0–500: aOR: 0.95; ≥ 801 vs. 0–500, aOR: 0.79), orthopedic surgery (aOR: 1.44), and obstetric surgery (aOR: 0.50). Coexisting diseases related to NPUSH were ischemic heart disease (aOR: 1.15), heart failure (aOR: 0.86), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR: 1.10), malignancy (aOR: 1.22), anxiety disorder (aOR: 1.46), schizophrenia (aOR: 1.85), alcohol-use disorder (aOR: 1.75), and other substance-use disorder (aOR: 4.95). Patients using the following medications had a higher risk of NPUSH: systemic steroids (aOR: 1.81), ephedrine (aOR: 1.31), theophylline (aOR: 1.27), diuretics (aOR: 1.88), and anti-depressants (aOR: 16.09). In addition, perioperative blood transfusion (aOR: 2.06), postoperative complications (aOR: 1.29), and ICU admission (aOR: 1.93) were significantly associated with NPUSH. (Table 2)

3.3. Subgroup Analyses

General anesthesia was associated with NPUSH compared with neuraxial anesthesia in the subgroups of age < 65 years (aOR: 1.25), no malignancy history (aOR: 1.17), no preoperative anxiety disorder (aOR: 1.19), no use of ephedrine (aOR: 1.21), no use of anti-depressants (aOR: 1.17), no perioperative use of blood transfusion (aOR: 1.17), and no admission to an ICU (aOR: 1.18) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Subgroup analyses of new postoperative uses of sedative–hypnotics for patients undergoing general or neuraxial anesthesia.

Subgroup n Event Rate (%) aOR (95% CI) p
Age ≥ 65 years GA 11,147 2789 25.0 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 0.3518
NA 11,921 2941 24.7 reference
Age < 65 years GA 34,964 5149 14.7 1.25 (1.20–1.31) <0.0001
NA 34,190 4137 12.1 reference
Male GA 25,607 4143 16.2 1.13 (1.08–1.19) <0.0001
NA 25,544 3695 14.5 reference
Female GA 20,504 3795 18.5 1.20 (1.14–1.27) <0.0001
NA 20,567 3383 16.5 reference
Malignancy history GA 2349 568 24.2 1.15 (1.00–1.33) 0.0566
NA 2436 554 22.7 reference
No malignancy history GA 43,762 7370 16.8 1.17 (1.12–1.21) <0.0001
NA 43,675 6524 14.9 reference
Anxiety disorder GA 1725 421 24.4 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.1962
NA 1716 460 26.8 reference
No anxiety disorder GA 44,386 7517 16.9 1.19 (1.14–1.23) <0.0001
NA 44,395 6618 14.9 reference
Use of systemic steroids GA 6725 1964 29.2 1.16 (1.07–1.26) 0.0003
NA 6703 1784 26.6 reference
No use of systemic steroids GA 39,386 5974 15.2 1.17 (1.12–1.22) <0.0001
NA 39,408 5294 13.4 reference
Use of ephedrine GA 7302 1425 19.5 1.02 (0.93–1.11) 0.6935
NA 7444 1399 18.8 reference
No use of ephedrine GA 38,809 6513 16.8 1.21 (1.16–1.26) <0.0001
NA 38,667 5679 14.7 reference
Use of theophylline GA 3753 954 25.4 1.12 (1.01–1.25) 0.0387
NA 3827 918 24.0 reference
No use of theophylline GA 42,358 6984 16.5 1.18 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NA 42,284 6160 14.6 reference
Use of diuretics GA 3867 1400 36.2 1.13 (1.03–1.25) 0.0116
NA 3883 1298 33.4 reference
No use of diuretics GA 42,244 6538 15.5 1.18 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NA 42,228 5780 13.7 reference
Use of anti-depressants GA 356 283 79.5 1.18 (0.79–1.75) 0.4150
NA 360 262 72.8 reference
No use of anti-depressants GA 45,755 7655 16.7 1.17 (1.13–1.21) <0.0001
NA 45,751 6816 14.9 reference
Postoperative complications GA 5126 1271 24.8 1.17 (1.07–1.29) 0.0011
NA 5422 1196 22.1 reference
No postoperative complication GA 40,985 6667 16.3 1.17 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NA 40,689 5882 14.5 reference
Blood transfusion GA 560 272 48.6 1.09 (0.84–1.43) 0.5240
NA 487 226 46.4 reference
No blood transfusion GA 45,551 7666 16.8 1.17 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NA 45,624 6852 15.0 reference
ICU admission GA 276 124 44.9 0.77 (0.50–1.20) 0.2494
NA 251 117 46.6 reference
No ICU admission GA 45,835 7814 17.1 1.18 (1.13–1.22) <0.0001
NA 45,860 6961 15.2 reference

Abbreviation: aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; GA = general anesthesia; ICU = intensive care unit; NA = neuraxial anesthesia. Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, insurance premium (categorical), types of surgery, coexisting diseases, lifestyle factors, concurrent medications, number of hospitalizations, number of emergency room visits, perioperative uses of blood transfusion, postoperative complications, and intensive care unit care.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrated that general anesthesia was associated with greater NPUSH compared with neuraxial anesthesia. The NPUSH risk associated with general anesthesia persisted 90 to 180 days after surgery. Our analyses identified some potentially modifiable factors for NPUSH, which may contribute to risk stratification and prevention before surgery. This study has several strengths to evaluate the putative effect of general anesthesia on NPUSH. First, we used a nationwide dataset to increase the patient sample and to cover the medical institutions of different levels, which increases the generalizability of the study results. Second, we used a propensity-score-matching analysis to balance the distributions of various patient and clinical factors and to minimize potential confounding effects. Our results suggest that types of anesthesia may impact the risk of new prescriptions of sedative–hypnotics among surgical patients, providing an implication in preventing the long-term misuse of these drugs.

This study is the first to compare the risk of NPUSH between general and neuraxial anesthesia among surgical patients. Most of the previous studies focused on polysomnography parameters instead of pragmatic outcomes (e.g., sedative–hypnotic prescriptions) [6,7,8,9,11,12,13]. In addition, prior studies did not evaluate the potential impact of different anesthesia techniques on sleep disturbances and sedative–hypnotic uses [6,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Our results suggested that patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia did have NPUSH and sleep disorders, but the risk was significantly lower than that of general anesthesia. Previous studies reported several risk factors for postoperative sleep disorders, including older age [8,27], more extensive surgical trauma [28], and longer length of hospital stay [10]. A recent study showed that perioperative benzodiazepine use was associated with postoperative persistent benzodiazepine use [14]. Our study added important evidence to the current literature by identifying more risk factors for NPUSH, including orthopedic surgery, preexisting malignancy and anxiety disorder, concurrent uses of systemic steroids, ephedrine, theophylline, diuretics, and anti-depressants, perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative complications, and admission to ICUs.

We proposed the following possible explanations for our findings. First, opioids and volatile anesthetics used in general anesthesia may disrupt the sleep/wake cycle and other circadian rhythms (e.g., melatonin secretion and body temperature) [5,6,7,8,9], although it remains controversial whether neuraxial anesthesia effectively reduces the postoperative uses of opioids [29]. Song and colleagues recently showed that subarachnoid anesthesia was related to less impairment of melatonin circadian rhythms and sleep patterns among elderly patients undergoing hip-fracture surgery [30]. Second, pain intensity is an established determinant for postoperative sleep quality, and vice versa [31,32]. Regional anesthesia has proven effective in reducing postoperative acute and chronic pain [33,34]. Third, surgery requiring general anesthesia might reflect the longer operative duration and more extensive surgical injury, which were potentially related to the complicated postoperative course and sleep deprivation. Noticeably, our results have been controlled for postoperative complications and the need for intensive care in the analytical model.

A database study showed that 15.2% and 4.9% of patients with new benzodiazepine prescriptions continued to use benzodiazepines for 1 year and 8 years, respectively [35]. Additionally, postoperative sleep deprivation is associated with delirium, higher sensitivity to pain, and longer length of hospital stay [10,31,36]. However, there are still few prophylactic and therapeutic measures to reduce postoperative sedative–hypnotic uses and to improve postoperative sleep quality. Avoiding perioperative benzodiazepine use may prevent persistent benzodiazepine use after surgery [14]. Furthermore, some clinical strategies have been developed to improve postoperative sleep, including laparoscopic techniques [37], melatonin supplementation [38], and dexmedetomidine infusion [39]. A clinical trial recently reported that propofol-based general anesthesia might promote postoperative sleep quality compared with volatile general anesthesia [40]. Our results indicated that regional anesthesia might protect surgical patients against postoperative sedative–hypnotic uses and sleep disorders, although the effect size appeared modest after adjustment for covariates.

The present study identified several modifiable risk factors for NPUSH. First, systemic corticosteroids, ephedrine, and diuretics are commonly used in the perioperative period. More studies are needed to evaluate their potential impact and threshold dose for postoperative sleep disturbances and NPUSH. Second, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion has been found to trigger systemic inflammation and potentially exert a detrimental effect on postoperative outcome [41]. In addition, the need for blood transfusion might reflect the longer duration of surgery and greater extent of surgical trauma. It is important to take the risks of NPUSH and sleep disorders into account when blood transfusion is considered for surgical patients. Third, sleep disturbance is common in patients admitted to ICU and is linked to functional disability after critical illness [42,43]. For patients at high risk of NPUSH, sleep medicine or psychiatric consultations may be required to improve postoperative sleep and to prevent sedative–hypnotic misuse. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the potential effect of modifiable disruptors to patient sleep in ICUs (e.g., noise, light, and patient care activities) on the long-term risk of sedative–hypnotic dependence and misuse [42].

There are some limitations to our study. First, our data did not contain information about objective physical measures (e.g., polysomnography parameters), biochemical laboratory tests (e.g., inflammation markers), the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, pain intensity, and clinical data on detailed surgical (e.g., elective, emergency, or urgent surgery, wound size, and operative duration) and anesthetic management (e.g., types and doses of opioids and non-opioid anesthetic drugs) that were not covered by the NHI research database. Second, it is possible that anesthesiologists may have chosen to prescribe general anesthesia to patients with an undocumented and untreated history of general anxiety disorders or other borderline psychiatric conditions [44,45]. The psychological predisposition and undiagnosed anxiety disorder could not be adjusted for in the multivariable analyses due to the lack of relevant data. In addition, although we did not consider the use of anxiolytics in the patient selection, the included benzodiazepine drugs are commonly used as preoperative anxiolytics [46]. Third, the indications for postoperative sedative–hypnotic prescriptions were unknown in some patients. Therefore, the biological mechanism of anesthesia-related NPUSH remains to be investigated. Fourth, we did not evaluate the sedative–hypnotic use beyond 180 days after surgery. It is uncertain whether the NPUSH developed into a long-term dependence or misuse. Fifth, this study did not include patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks due to its small patient sample and analytical difficulty in matching three groups. Last, our cohort was only followed up until December 31, 2013, due to the regulations of the NHI research database.

5. Conclusions

Patients undergoing general anesthesia had an increased risk of NPUSH and sleep disorders compared with neuraxial anesthesia among surgical patients. The general-anesthesia-related NPUSH risk persisted 90 to 180 days after surgery. More studies are needed to clarify the potential causal relationship and biological mechanism, and to evaluate the potential impact on anesthesia care.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11123360/s1, Table S1. ICD-9-CM codes of coexisting diseases, lifestyle factors, postoperative complications, and outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-L.W.; Data curation, Y.-X.D. and T.-J.C.; Formal analysis, Y.-H.T.; Funding acquisition, Y.-H.T.; Investigation, Y.-H.T.; Methodology, Y.-H.T.; Project administration, Y.-H.T.; Resources, Y.-G.C.; Software, Y.-H.T.; Supervision, J.P.C., M.-H.C., J.-T.C., Y.-G.C. and C.-W.W.; Validation, C.-C.L.; Writing—original draft, C.-Y.T. and H.-Y.L.; Writing—review & editing, J.P.C., Y.-X.D., M.-H.C., J.-T.C., T.-J.C., H.-L.W., Y.-G.C., C.-W.W. and Y.-H.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study obtained the approval from the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University in Taiwan (TMU-JIRB-N202101005; data of approval on 7 January 2021). All methods of this study were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and relevant regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the regulations of the Institutional Review Board.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the grants from Taipei Medical University (TMU110-AE1-B11) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST109-2314-B-038-024), Taipei, Taiwan.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Murphy Y., Wilson E., Goldner E.M., Fischer B. Benzodiazepine Use, Misuse, and Harm at the Population Level in Canada: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Data and Developments Since 1995. Clin. Drug Investig. 2016;36:519–530. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0397-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Votaw V.R., Geyer R., Rieselbach M.M., McHugh R.K. The epidemiology of benzodiazepine misuse: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;200:95–114. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones C.M., McAninch J.K. Emergency department visits and overdose deaths from combined use of opioids and benzodiazepines. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015;49:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brandt J., Leong C. Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs: An Updated Review of Major Adverse Outcomes Reported on in Epidemiologic Research. Drugs R&D. 2017;17:493–507. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0207-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Luo M., Song B., Zhu J. Sleep Disturbances After General Anesthesia: Current Perspectives. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:629. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dimsdale J.E., Norman D., Dejardin D., Wallace M.S. The effect of opioids on sleep architecture. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2007;3:33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chung F., Liao P., Elsaid H., Shapiro C.M., Kang W. Factors Associated with Postoperative Exacerbation of Sleep-disordered Breathing. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:299–311. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Curtis A.F., Miller M.B., Rathinakumar H., Robinson M., Staud R., Berry R.B., McCrae C.S. Opioid use, pain intensity, age, and sleep architecture in patients with fibromyalgia and insomnia. Pain. 2019;160:2086–2092. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pick J., Chen Y., Moore J.T., Sun Y., Wyner A.J., Friedman E.B., Kelz M.B. Rapid eye movement sleep debt accrues in mice exposed to volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:702–712. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822ddd72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kjølhede P., Langström P., Nilsson P., Wodlin N.B., Nilsson L. The impact of quality of sleep on recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2012;8:395–402. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cronin A.J., Keifer J.C., Davies M.F., King T.S., Bixler E.O. Postoperative sleep disturbance: Influences of opioids and pain in humans. Sleep. 2001;24:39–44. doi: 10.1093/sleep/24.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krenk L., Jennum P., Kehlet H. Sleep disturbances after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br. J. Anaesth. 2012;109:769–775. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dette F., Cassel W., Urban F., Zoremba M., Koehler U., Wulf H., Graf J., Steinfeldt T. Occurrence of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Deprivation after Surgery under Regional Anesthesia. Anesthesia Analg. 2013;116:939–943. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182860e58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wright J.D., Cogan J.C., Huang Y., Tergas A.I., Clair C.M.S., Hou J.Y., Khoury-Collado F., Gockley A., Accordino M., Melamed A., et al. Association of New Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use with Persistent Benzodiazepine Use. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021;4:e2112478. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gøtzsche P.C., Vandenbroucke J.P. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dai Y.-X., Tai Y.-H., Chen C.-C., Chang Y.-T., Chen T.-J., Chen M.-H. Bidirectional association between alopecia areata and sleep disorders: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Sleep Med. 2020;75:112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu C.-Y., Wu C.-Y., Lin Y.-H., Chang Y.-T. Statins did not reduce the mortality risk in patients with bullous pemphigoid: A population-based cohort study. Dermatol. Sin. 2021;39:153. doi: 10.4103/ds.ds_14_21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dai Y.X., Tai Y.H., Chang Y.T., Chen T.J., Chen M.H. Increased risk of alopecia areata among patients with endometriosis: A longitudinal study in Taiwan. Dermatol. Sin. 2021;39:41–44. doi: 10.4103/ds.ds_52_20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Health Insurance Research Database Data Subsets. [(accessed on 1 June 2022)]. Available online: https://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/Data_Subsets.html.
  • 20.Austin P.C. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat. Med. 2013;33:1057–1069. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jolley R.J., Liang Z., Peng M., Pendharkar S.R., Tsai W., Chen G., A Eastwood C., Quan H., Ronksley P.E. Identifying Cases of Sleep Disorders through International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Codes in Administrative Data. Int. J. Popul. Data Sci. 2018;3:448. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i1.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leblanc M., Mérette C., Savard J., Ivers H., Baillargeon L., Morin C.M. Incidence and Risk Factors of Insomnia in a Population-Based Sample. Sleep. 2009;32:1027–1037. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.8.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tai Y.H., Wu H.L., Mandell M.S., Lin S.P., Tsou M.Y., Chang K.Y. The association of non-small-cell lung cancer recurrence with allogenic blood transfusion following surgical resection: A propensity score analysis of 1803 patients. Eur. J. Cancer. 2020;140:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tai Y.H., Wu H.L., Mandell M.S., Tsou M.Y., Chang K.Y. The association of allogeneic blood transfusion and the recurrence of hepatic cancer after surgical resection. Anaesthesia. 2019;75:464–471. doi: 10.1111/anae.14862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Van Gastel A. Drug-induced insomnia and excessive sleepiness. Sleep Med. Clin. 2018;13:147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Austin P.C. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat. Med. 2009;28:3083–3107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sterniczuk R., Rusak B., Rockwood K. Sleep disturbance in older ICU patients. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:969–977. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S59927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yilmaz H., Iskesen I. Follow-up with Objective and Subjective Tests of the Sleep Characteristics of Patients after Cardiac Surgery. Circ. J. 2007;71:1506–1510. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ladha K.S., Patorno E., Liu J., Bateman B.T. Impact of perioperative epidural placement on postdischarge opioid use in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:396–403. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song Y., Liu Y., Yuan Y., Jia X., Zhang W., Wang G., Jia Y., Wang X., Liu L., Li W., et al. Effects of general versus subarachnoid anaesthesia on circadian melatonin rhythm and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A prospective cohort clinical trial. eBioMedicine. 2021;70:103490. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Finan P.H., Goodin B.R., Smith M.T. The Association of Sleep and Pain: An Update and a Path Forward. J. Pain. 2013;14:1539–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wright C.E., Bovbjerg D.H., Montgomery G.H., Weltz C., Goldfarb A., Pace B., Silverstein J.H. Disrupted Sleep the Night Before Breast Surgery Is Associated with Increased Postoperative Pain. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2009;37:352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hutton M., Brull R., Macfarlane A. Regional anaesthesia and outcomes. BJA Educ. 2018;18:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Andreae M., Andreae D. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013;111:711–720. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Takeshima N., Ogawa Y., Hayasaka Y., Furukawa T.A. Continuation and discontinuation of benzodiazepine prescriptions: A cohort study based on a large claims database in Japan. Psychiatry Res. 2016;237:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Todd O.M., Gelrich L., MacLullich A.M., Driessen M., Thomas C., Kreisel S.H. Sleep Disruption at Home as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017;65:949–957. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gögenur I., Bisgaard T., Burgdorf S., Van Someren E., Rosenberg J. Disturbances in the circadian pattern of activity and sleep after laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2008;23:1026–1031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Madsen M.T., Hansen M.V., Andersen L.T., Hageman I., Rasmussen L.S., Bokmand S., Rosenberg J., Gögenur I. Effect of Melatonin on Sleep in the Perioperative Period after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2016;12:225–233. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen Z., Tang R., Zhang R., Jiang Y., Liu Y. Effects of dexmedetomidine administered for postoperative analgesia on sleep quality in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. J. Clin. Anesth. 2016;36:118–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li S., Song B., Li Y., Zhu J. Effects of Intravenous Anesthetics vs. Inhaled Anesthetics on Early Postoperative Sleep Quality and Complications of Patients After Laparoscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia. Nat. Sci. Sleep. 2021;13:375–382. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S300803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cata J., Wang H., Gottumukkala V., Reuben J., Sessler D. Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013;110:690–701. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pisani M.A., Friese R.S., Gehlbach B.K., Schwab R.J., Weinhouse G.L., Jones S.F. Sleep in the intensive care unit. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015;191:731–738. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201411-2099CI. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Altman M.T., Knauert M.P., Murphy T.E., Ahasic A.M., Chauhan Z., Pisani M.A. Association of intensive care unit delirium with sleep disturbance and functional disability after critical illness: An observational cohort study. Ann. Intensiv. Care. 2018;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0408-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maheshwari D., Ismail S. Preoperative anxiety in patients selecting either general or regional anesthesia for elective cesarean section. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015;31:196–200. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.155148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Capdevila X., Aveline C., Delaunay L., Bouaziz H., Zetlaoui P., Choquet O., Jouffroy L., Herman-Demars H., Bonnet F. Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study. Adv. Ther. 2019;37:527–540. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01171-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bucx M.J., Krijtenburg P., Kox M. Preoperative use of anxiolytic-sedative agents; are we on the right track? J. Clin. Anesth. 2016;33:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the regulations of the Institutional Review Board.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES