Table 4.

Uterine septum versus controls (no septum)—comparative studies.

Study	A Clearly Stated Aim	Inclusion of Consecutive Patients	Prospective Collection of Data	Endpoints Appropriate to the Aim of the Study	Unbiased Assessment of the Study Endpoint	Follow-Up Period Appropriate to the Aim of the Study	Loss to Follow Up less than 5%	Prospective Calculation of the Study Size	An Adequate Control Group	Contemporary Groups	Baseline Equivalence of Groups	Adequate Statistical Analyses	Final Score
Acien et al., 1993. [14]	**	**		**		**	*		*	**	*	*	14
Woelfer et al., 2001. [26]	**	**	**	**	*			*	**	**	**	**	18
Ozgur et al., 2007. [27]	**	**		**					**	**	**	**	14
Zlopaša et al., 2007. [28]	**	*	*	**					*	**	**	**	13
Ban-Frangez et al., 2009. [29]	**	**		**					**	**	**	**	14
Sugiura-Ogasawara et al., [30]	**	**		**		*	*		**	**	**	**	16
Tomazevic et al., 2010. [31]	**	**	*	**					**	**	**	**	15
Saravelos et al., 2010. [32]	**	**	**	**	*				**	**	**	**	17
Jayaprakasan et al., 2011. [33]	**	**	**	**	*	*		*	**	**	**	**	19
Prior et al., 2017. [10]	**	**	**	**	*	*	**	**	**	**	**	**	22

Each item is scored as “missing” not reported, “*” reported but inadequate; “**” reported and adequate.