Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3546. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123546

Table 3.

Bivariate correlation analysis between cFTOE and crSaO2 with IR, TAM, tcSaO2 and tcSaO2_FiO2.

Average crSaO2 cFTOE
Variables Correlation Coefficient ρ [95% CI] Correlation Coefficient ρ [95% CI]
IR −0.06 [−0.35, 0.25] 0.04 [−0.26, 0.36]
MAP
Day 1 0.40 [0.15, 0.61] * −0.40 [−0.61, −0.14] *
Day 2 0.34 [0.07, 0.56] * −0.33 [−0.53, −0.08] *
Day 3 0.41 [0.16, 0.63] * −0.39 [−0.62, −0.15] *
Day 4 (a) 0.44 [0.15, 0.69] * −0.41 [−0.65, −0.14] *
SatO2
Day 1 0.10 [−0.15, 0.33] −0.05 [−0.28, 0.21]
Day 2 0.05 [−0.25, 0.32] 0.01 [−0.26, 0.28]
Day 3 0.32 [0.01, 0.59] * −0.28 [−0.54, 0.04]
Day 4 0.03 [−0.31, 0.34] 0.0001 [−0.31, 0.31]
SatO2_FiO2
Day 1 (b) 0.04 [−0.23, 0.31] −0.02 [−0.29, 0.29]
Day 2 0.17 [−0.11, 0.43] −0.15 [−0.41, 0.14]
Day 3 0.23 [−0.07, 0.50] −0.23 [−0.47, 0.04]
Day 4 (c) 0.21 [−0.12, 0.48] −0.21 [−0.48, 0.09]

crSaO2: cerebral regional oxygen saturation; cFTOE: cerebral fractional tissue oxygen extraction; (a) complete case data n = 41; (b) complete case data n = 47; (c) complete case data n = 43; 95% CI = 95% the confidence interval for Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated using the percentile method based on 1000 bootstrapped samples with replacement; * significant level: p < 0.05