Table 6.
Study | Localization of Mucositis | Grade (Percentage of Patients, %) | Time to Onset of Mucositis (Days) |
Time to Resolution or Healing (Days, Median) |
Administration of Additional Nutrition (Percentage of Patients, %) |
General Result 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Control | |||
ADULT POPULATION | ||||||||||
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment | ||||||||||
de Sanctis V. et al. [30] | oral cavity | CTCAE 2 4.0 III or IV— 40.6 |
CTCAE 4.0 III or IV— 41.6 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | enteral nutrition 37.5 | enteral nutrition 16.6 |
non-significant 3 |
Sharma A. et al. [20] | oral cavity | NCI CTC 4 2.0 0—28 I—11 II—8 III—2 IV—50 |
NCI CTC 2.0 0—7 I—10 II—5 III—8 IV—69 |
22 (±13.2) | 18 (±11.6) | 43 | 43 | parenteral nutrition or insertion of a Ryle’s tube 22 | parenteral nutrition or insertion of a Ryle’s tube 34 | improvement |
Topuz E. et al. [34] | oral cavity | NCI CTC 2.0 0 72.7 I 12.1 II 12.1 III 1.0 IV 2.0 |
NCI CTC 2.0 0 78.3 I 13.2 II 7.5 III 0.9 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | non-significant |
Jiang C. et al. [25] |
oral cavity | CTCAE 4.0 0—12.07 I—55.17 II—17.24 III—15.52 |
CTCAE 4.0 0—0 I—0 II—54.29 III—45.71 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | improvement |
Xia C. et al. [27] | oral cavity | CTCAE 4.0 0—13.9 I—36.1 II—25 III—22.2 IV—2.8 |
CTCAE 4.0 0—0 I—14.7 II—38.2 III—32.4 IV—14.7 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | improvement |
CHILD POPULATION | ||||||||||
Radiotherapy treatment | ||||||||||
Shu-Xu Du et al. [37] |
oral cavity | CTCAE 3.0 I—66.7 II—33.3 III—0 IV—0 |
CTCAE 3.0 I—31.8 II—45.45 III—22.7 IV—0 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | improvement |
1 Significantly better outcomes in the study group in at least one parameter (α = 0.05); 2 CTCAE—Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; 3 significant—in need of enteral nutrition for patients in experimental group compared to control group; 4 NCI CTC—National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.