Table 1.
Typical polymers—general properties and fabrication of polymeric MNs.
| Material | Advantages | Limitations | Fabrication Techniques | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PVA | Low material costs Good plasticity Dissolvability and nontoxicity |
Greater rate of absorbency | Molding fused deposition method (FDM) | [23,24] |
| 2. PLGA | Preparation of dissolving microneedles (MNs) | Material costs are high | Molding, hot embossing | [25,26] |
| 3. HA | Faster rate of dissolving | Chances of skin irritability | Micro-molding | [27] |
| 4. PCL | Good thermal stability High rate of permeability |
Process of slow degradation | 3D printing, micro-molding | [28,29] |
| 5. PEGDA | Can penetrate easily into molecular spaces | High material cost | Photolithography | [30] |
| 6. PGA | Faster rate of degradation Exceptional mechanical strength |
High material cost | Injection molding technique lithography |
[31,32] |
| 7. PLA | Higher rates of tensile strength Excellent physical and mechanical rigidity |
Costly material Slower rate of degradation |
Molding | [33,34,35] |
| 8. PVP | Good plasticity and dissolvability | Difficulty in fabrication | Molding and photo polymerization |
[36] |
| 9. PDMS | Good biocompatibility and flexibility | Less penetrability | Micro-molding, curing | [37] |
| 10. Poly (Ethylene Glycol-co-methacrylic-acid) | Good biocompatibility | Good drug transport mechanism | Bulk polymerization | [37] |
| 11. Cellulose acetate | Good base material | Bio fluid extractions/insulin delivery | Mold casting method | [37] |
| 12. PGMA | Good penetration efficiency | Drug delivery/ISF sampling | photopolymerization | [37] |
Abbreviations: PVA: polyvinyl alcohol, PLGA: poly lactic-co-glycolic acid, HA: hyaluronic acid, PEGDA: poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate, PGA: polyglycolide; PLA: poly (lactic acid), PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone, PDMS, Poly (Ethylene glycol-co-methacrylic-acid), PGMA: Poly Glycidyl methacrylate.