Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;11:e74519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74519

Appendix 1—table 1. Anatomical parameters, early markers of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, and echocardiographic parameters were measured in wild-type (WT) mice after subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls (n=6–7/group).

Appendix 1—table 1—source data 1.
2 d 1 w 2 w 4 w
Sham TAC Sham TAC Sham TAC Sham TAC
Anatomical parameter
n 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6
HW/BW 4.4±0.1 4.5±0.1 5.1±0.2 7.3±0.7*** 4.5±0.3 7.1±1.1*** 4.5±0.3 7.1±0.8**
HW/TL 6.0±0.2 6.0±0.1 6.7±0.6 8.4±0.6*** 6.0±0.3 9.3±1.4*** 6.3±0.5 9.7±1.6***
Early markers of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis
n 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7
ANP 1.0±0.3 1.1±0.2 1.0±0.5 9.1±3.9*** 1.0±0.4 28.1±11.5*** 1.0±0.2 7.3±1.9***
BNP 1.0±0.2 0.7±0.1 1.0±0.4 11.5±2.0*** 1.0±0.3 5.2±1.1*** 1.0±0.4 2.7±0.4**
Collagenase-1 1.0±0.4 1.4±0.7 1.0±0.4 1.1±0.3 1.0±1.3 1.0±0.7 1.0±0.2 6.8±2.5**
Collagenase-3 1.0±0.2 1.0±0.5 1.0±0.4 1.30±0.25 1.0±1.1 2.5±2.1 1.0±0.3 3.8±1.2**
Echocardiographic parameters
n 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6
EF (%) 66.4±7.2 65.0±8.9 71.0±5.9 68.7±3.5 75.7±4.4 60.2±3.9*** 68.8±3.3 52.8±10.6**
FS (%) 36.0±5.1 34.2±6.7 39.8±6.6 36.1±3.5 43.4±4.0 31.3±2.6*** 37.6±2.7 26.9±6.5**

HW/BW: heart weight to body weight ratio, HW/TL: heart weight to tibia length ratio, EF: ejection fraction, FS: fractional shortening, Data represent means ± SD, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, compared between sham- and TAC operated groups.