Table 1.
Input values used in the model and, where applicable, ranges used in the sensitivity analyses
Input | Value | DSA range | ICER |
PSA distribution | Source | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Higher | |||||
Discount rate |
3% |
[0–6%] |
14689.84 |
16627.39 |
Beta |
|
|
|
Aspects related to the vaccine |
||||
B strain distribution:a 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 |
38.8% 23.4% 36.6% 32.1% 38.5% 19.0% 10.7% |
±20% | Beta | FluNet Network25 | ||
Match levelb | 50% | [20–80%] | 9510.03 | 41,564.84 | Beta | Based on Reed 201234 |
Vaccine efficacy against A ≤4 5–19 high-risk 20–49 high-risk 50–64 high-risk ≥65 |
0.59 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.58 |
[.41, .74] [.47, .70] [.48, .70] [.48, .70] [.38, .72] |
15,921.00 | 15,921.00 | Ranges are the 95% CI reported in Clements et al.(2014)26 | |
Vaccine efficacy against matched B ≤4 5–19 high-risk 20–49 high-risk 50–64 high-risk ≥65 |
0.66 0.77 0.77 0.73 0.69 |
[.12, .94] [.17, .94] [.18, .94] [.18, .96] [.16; .99] |
Ranges are the 95% CI reported in Clements et al. (2014)26 | |||
Vaccine efficacy against mismatched B ≤4 5–19 high-risk 20–49 high-risk 50–64 high-risk ≥65 |
0.44 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.47 |
NAc | ||||
Cross-protection | 67% | [54%–81%] | 11,066.67 | 28,317.82 | Ranges were calculated based on Clements et al. (2014)26 | |
Vaccination coverage: ≤4 5–19 high-risk 20–49 high-risk 50–64 high-risk ≥65 |
23.0% 10.2% 10.2% 10.2% 29.3% |
±20% |
15,921.00 |
15,921.00 |
Beta |
Ministry of Health, Uruguay27 |
|
|
Medical visits and direct costs |
||||
Influenza-attributable GP consultation rates |
Specific by age and season (see Suppl. Table S4) | ±20% | 17,808.75 | 14,360.16 | Based on Molinari et al. (2007)28 | |
Influenza-attributable hospitalization rates | 15,956.45 | 15,885.54 | ||||
Influenza-attributable mortality | 17,792.84 | 14,405.50 | ||||
Number of non-consulting cases per consulting case ≤4 5–19 high-risk 20–49 high-risk 50–64 high-risk ≥65 |
0.46 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.39 |
±20% | 16,721.89 | 15,193.31 | Beta (applied on the probability of consultation per case) | Based on Molinari et al. (2007)28 |
TIV price | US$2.65 | +/- 20% | 19,559.88 | 12,282.11 | PAHO Revolving Fund, Vaccines Price 201937 | |
QIV price | US$5.14 | +/- 20% | 8862.93 | 22979.06 | PAHO Revolving Fund, Vaccines Price 201937 | |
Cost of physician visit | US$82.05 | +/- 20% | 16115.48 | 15726.51 | Log Normal | CINVE Consultora de Salud36 |
Cost of hospitalization | US$499.650 | +/- 20% | 15956.45 | 15885.54 | Log Normal | CINVE Consultora de Salud36 |
Prescribed drug cost—GP visits and OTC | +/- 20% | 15921.00 | 15921.00 | Log Normal | Uruguay Pharmacy Center38 | |
≤4 | US$1.34 | |||||
Other age groups |
US$2.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect costs |
||||
Workdays lost | +/- 20% | 15921.00 | 15921.00 | Log Normal | Aiko et al. (2000)39 | |
Quality of life | ||||||
Utility norms | NA | |||||
<4 | 0.9720 | |||||
5–19 high-risk | 0.8213 | |||||
20–49 high-risk | 0.7962 | |||||
50–59 high-risk | 0.7929 | |||||
≥60 | 0.9300 | |||||
QALY losses due to influenza | +/- 20% | Beta | Sander et al. (2010)47 | |||
≤4 | 0.0146 | |||||
5–19 high-risk | 0.0146 | |||||
20–49 high-risk | 0.0173 | |||||
50–64 high-risk | 0.0173 | |||||
≥65 | 0.0293 |
aB strains as a percentage of all reported cases.
bPercentage match between the B subtype in the TIV vaccine and the dominant serotype during a season.
cVaccine efficacy against mismatched B is calculated from efficacy against matched B and degree of cross-protection. As both of these were included in the sensitivity analysis, there was no need to include vaccine efficacy against mismatched B in the sensitivity analysis.
Details on the calculations for the parameters used in the PSA distribution are included in the supplemental material.
DSA, deterministic sensitivity analysis; GP, general practitioner; NA, not applicable; OTC, over-the-counter; PAHO, Pan American Health Organization; PSA, probabilistic sensitivity analysis; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; QIV, quadrivalent influenza vaccine; TIV, trivalent influenza vaccine.