Table 1.
Percentage of correct identification of outliers, masking and swamping for simulation data with three predictors .
| % Correct detection | % Masking | % Swamping | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| θ | n | RMD | Hat Matrix | DRGP | FP-ε-SVR | nu-SVR | RMD | Hat Matrix | DRGP | FP-ε-SVR | nu-SVR | RMD | Hat Matrix | DRGP | FP-ε-SVR | nu-SVR |
| %5 | 20 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 0.085 | 0 |
| 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.5 | 10 | 17 | 0.375 | 0.022 | |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.4 | 15 | 7.49 | 0.454 | 0 | |
| 160 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.31 | 6.25 | 7.5 | 0.462 | 0 | |
| %10 | 20 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.25 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 0.075 | 0 | |
| 100 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.3 | 11 | 2.93 | 0.02 | 0 | |
| 160 | 100 | 62.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.44 | 10.62 | 1.25 | 0.025 | 0 | |
| %15 | 20 | 100 | 66.66 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 33.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0.005 |
| 40 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.72 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 0.002 | 0 | |
| 100 | 100 | 46.66 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 53.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.75 | 10 | 0 | 0.006 | 0 | |
| 160 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.88 | 8.75 | 1.25 | 0.007 | 0 | |
| %20 | 20 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | 100 | 37.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.33 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 100 | 100 | 35 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.79 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 160 | 100 | 37.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.47 | 8.75 | 0.625 | 0 | 0 | |