Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;18(5):2052657. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2052657

Table 2.

Summary of the primary objective results: serogroup C seroprotection rates (≥1:8) and GMTs following a single dose of MenACYW-TT, MCV4-TT or MenC-TT (PPAS)

  Seroprotection rates (95% CI) GMTs (95% CI)
hSBA n/M % (95% CI) M % (95% CI)
MenACYW-TT 213/214 99.5 (97.4, 100) 214 515 (450, 591)
MCV4-TT 188/211 89.1 (84.1, 93.0) 211 31.6 (26.5, 37.6)
  Difference (97.5% CI) 10.43 (5.68, 16.20) Ratio (97.5% CI) 16.3 (12.7, 21.0)
Conclusion Non-inferiority*: Yes
Superiority†: Yes
  Non-inferiority‡: Yes
Superiority§: Yes
 
rSBA n/M % (95% CI) M % (95% CI)
MenACYW-TT 213/213 100 (98.3, 100) 213 2143 (1870, 2456)
MenC-TT 215/215 100 (98.3, 100) 215 1624 (1425, 1850)
  Difference (97.5% CI) 0.0 (−2.30, 2.28) Ratio (97.5% CI) 1.32 (1.06, 1.64)
Conclusion Non-inferiority*: Yes   Non-inferiority‡: Yes
Superiority§: Yes
 

GMT, geometric mean titer; M, number of participants with available data; n, number of participants meeting the endpoint; PPAS, hSBA and rSBA per protocol analysis sets.

*Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower-limit of the 97.5% CI of the difference was >–10%.

†Superiority was demonstrated if the lower-limit of the 97.5% CI of the difference was >0%.

‡Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower-limit of the 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs was >1/1.5.

§Superiority was demonstrated if the lower-limit of the 97.5% CI of the ratio between GMTs was >1.