Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;12(6):779. doi: 10.3390/life12060779

Table 2.

Outcomes from intention to treat analysis regarding parents.

FI T0 (n = 21) FI T1 (n = 21) FI T2 (n = 21) CI T0 (n = 21) CI T1 (n = 21) CI T2 (n = 21) FI–CI Time Group × Time
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) Mean (SD) F(2,40) F(2,40)
% % % % % % p p p
(95% CI) Eta² Eta²
Knowledge (both)
Total Score 27.83 (2.96) 29.77 (5.86) 30.07 (2.53) 27.11 (5.61) 30.98 (2.46) 29.91 (1.75) 0.11 (3.69) 13.73 1.37
(max 45) 62% 66% 67% 60% 69% 66% p = 0.846
[−1.03; 1.25]
p < 0.001 **
0.156
p = 0.258
0.018
Food pyramid 7.43 (1.81) 8.53 (1.40) 8.77 (1.00) 6.82 (1.97) 8.59 (1.02) 8.59 (1.05) −0.24 (1.42) 26.20 0.99
(max 11) 68% 78% 80% 62% 78% 78% p = 0.265
[−0.68; 0.19]
p < 0.001 **
0.261
p = 0.374
0.013
Energy density 0.82 (0.14) 0.86 (0.20) 0.84 (0.16) 0.82 (0.21) 0.90 (0.11) 0.81 (0.14) 0.00 (1.62) 3.35 0.86
score (max 15) 5% 6% 6% 5% 6% 5% p = 0.895
[−0.05; 0.05]
p = 0.038 *
0.043
p = 0.426
0.011
Stress score 8.07 (0.98) 8.43 (2.18) 7.96 (0.58) 8.28 (1.40) 8.46 (0.55) 8.30 (0.59) 0.19 (1.17) 1.76 0.39
(max 15) 54% 56% 53% 55% 56% 55% p = 0.289
[−0.17; 0.05]
p = 0.176
0.024
p = 0.680
0.005

* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01.