Table 3.
Beneficial bacteria which demonstrated protection against main barley pathogens.
| Strains | Origin | Pathogen | Biostimulation | Mode of Action of Biocontrol | M&M | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudomonas fluorescens MKB100 and MKB156 | Cereal rhizosphere | P. teres | n/a | ISR | Field, greenhouse (leaves and drenching) and in vitro | [161] |
| Production of antifungal compounds (2,4-DAPG and HCN) | ||||||
| Pseudomonas chlororaphis MA 342 | Craw berry rhizosphere | D. teres | n/a | n/a | Field and greenhouse (seeds) | [157,162,163] |
| D. graminea | ||||||
| U. hordei | ||||||
| Paenibacillus polymyxa KaI245 | Sorghum rhizosphere | Drechsclera teres f. sp. teres and Rhynchosporium commune | Yes | Cell free supernatant | In vitro and greenhouse (leaves) | [164] |
| Burkholderia sp. strain BE25 | Maize rhizosphere | P. teres | Yes | Induction plant genes defense | In vitro and greenhouse (leaves) | [165,166] |
| Limitation of the fungus on photosynthetic and respiratory parameters |
Rows highlighted in grey depict the authors hypothesis for the mode of action of beneficial bacteria based on their preliminary studies.