Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;25(1):184–196. doi: 10.1080/15685551.2022.2088977

Table 3.

Comparison of the present method for sensing of Hg2+ with reported methods.

Optical probe Linear range (μM) LOD (M) Ref.
Quinoline-based derivative/I 0–7 3.12 × 10−9 [17]
Green-emission carbon dots 0–50 8.9 × 10−7 [18]
Rhodamine-containing CP 10–50 1.07 × 10−8 [27]
Triphenylamine-based CP/I 0–7 1.1 × 10−7 [42]
Triazole and Cz-containing CP/I 0–10 1.23 × 10−7 [43]
Blue-emission carbon dots 0–40 9.0 × 10−7 [54]
Triphenylamine-bodipy derivative 0–7.5 2.24 × 10−7 [59]
Naphthalimide derivative 0.25–10 4.0 × 10−8 [60]
Coumarin derivative 1–6 2.2 × 10−7 [61]
Dendritic Carbazole-Based CP/I 0.005–14.75 9.7 × 10−8 This work