Table 3.
Comparison of the present method for sensing of Hg2+ with reported methods.
| Optical probe | Linear range (μM) | LOD (M) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quinoline-based derivative/I− | 0–7 | 3.12 × 10−9 | [17] |
| Green-emission carbon dots | 0–50 | 8.9 × 10−7 | [18] |
| Rhodamine-containing CP | 10–50 | 1.07 × 10−8 | [27] |
| Triphenylamine-based CP/I− | 0–7 | 1.1 × 10−7 | [42] |
| Triazole and Cz-containing CP/I− | 0–10 | 1.23 × 10−7 | [43] |
| Blue-emission carbon dots | 0–40 | 9.0 × 10−7 | [54] |
| Triphenylamine-bodipy derivative | 0–7.5 | 2.24 × 10−7 | [59] |
| Naphthalimide derivative | 0.25–10 | 4.0 × 10−8 | [60] |
| Coumarin derivative | 1–6 | 2.2 × 10−7 | [61] |
| Dendritic Carbazole-Based CP/I− | 0.005–14.75 | 9.7 × 10−8 | This work |