Table 3.
Judges’ reported use of intrinsic emotion regulation strategies.
| M | S E | Modea | SD | Skew | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive pre-appraisal | 3.83 | 0.10 | 4 – Agree | 0.93 | –0.65 | 93 |
| Cognitive reappraisal | 3.56 | 0.10 | 3 – Neutral | 1.01 | –0.13 | 93 |
| Situation selectiona | 3.51 | 0.12 | 3 – Neutral 4 – Agree |
1.19 | –0.54 | 94 |
| Suppression | 3.46 | 0.11 | 4 – Agree | 1.11 | –0.28 | 99 |
| Cognitive acceptance | 3.33 | 0.12 | 4 – Agree | 1.18 | –0.35 | 94 |
| Attentional deployment | 2.88 | 0.11 | 3 – Neutral | 1.09 | 0.44 | 94 |
| Situation modification | 2.64 | 0.12 | 3 – Neutral | 1.18 | 0.17 | 101 |
aWhere there are two modes, both are indicated.