Table 4.
Judges’ reported use of extrinsic emotion regulation strategies.
| M | S E | Modea | SD | Skew | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Situation selection | 3.61 | 0.10 | 3 – Neutral | 0.98 | –0.14 | 97 |
| Cognitive reappraisal | 3.48 | 0.11 | 3 – Neutral | 0.98 | –0.23 | 83 |
| Cognitive pre-appraisala | 3.38 | 0.11 | 3 – Neutral 4 – Agree |
1.08 | –0.33 | 92 |
| Suppression | 3.33 | 0.11 | 4 – Agree | 1.06 | –0.14 | 93 |
| Attentional deployment | 3.13 | 0.11 | 3 – Neutral | 1.04 | –0.20 | 94 |
| Cognitive acceptance | 3.10 | 0.11 | 3 – Neutral | 1.03 | –0.08 | 88 |
| Situation modificationa | 3.07 | 0.12 | 3 – Neutral 4 – Agree |
1.17 | –0.15 | 94 |
aWhere there are two modes, both are indicated.