Table 2.
Pearson correlations (two-tailed) between variables.
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Abuse frequencya | .03 | −.02 | −.07 | −.12 | −.10 | −.09 | −.09 | −.16* | −.12 |
2. Reporting timingb | .01 | .04 | .25** | .24** | .23** | .29** | .24** | .18* | |
3. Child agec | −.03 | −.08 | −.08 | −.08 | −.05 | −.06 | −.09 | ||
4. Question typed | −.20** | −.22** | −.16* | −.23** | −.19** | −.14 | |||
5. Overall credibility rating | .92** | .93** | .88** | .94** | .91** | ||||
6. Accuracy subscale | .82** | .77** | .82** | .75** | |||||
7. Believability subscale | .80** | .83** | .82** | ||||||
8. Competency subscale | .82** | .73** | |||||||
9. Reliability subscale | .82** | ||||||||
10. Truthfulness subscale |
aAbuse frequency was coded as single-instance abuse = 0, repeated abuse = 1. bReporting timing was coded as delayed reporting = 0, recent reporting = 1. cChild age was coded as 6 years old = 0, 10 years old = 1. dQuestion type was coded as open questioning = 0, closed questioning = 1.
*p < .05. **p < .01.