Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;29(2):155–182. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1894259

Table 3.

Quality appraisal using AXIS checklist.

Name of first author (year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Total
(max 20)
RQ SD SD RQ SD RB RB SD RB RQ RQ RQ RB RB RB RQ SD RQ SD SD
Allard et al. (2003) X X X X 16
Anson and Bloom (1988) X X X X X X X 13
Dir et al. (2019) X X X X 16
Gayman and Bradley (2013) X X X X 16
Gayman et al. (2018) X X X X X 15
Holgate and Clegg (1991) X X X X X 13
Holloway (2019) X X X X 16
Jin et al. (2018) X X 17
Lewis et al. (2013) X X X X X 15
Lindquist and Whitehead (1986) X X X X X X X X X 11
Merhav et al. (2018) X X X X 15
Rhineberger-Dunn et al. (2016) X X X X 16
Rhineberger-Dunn et al. (2017) X X X X 16
White et al. (2015) X X X X X 15
Whitehead (1985) X X X X X X X X 12
Whitehead (1986a) X X X X X X X X 12
Whitehead (1986b) X X X X X X X 12
Whitehead (1987) X X X X X 15
Whitehead and Lindquist (1985) X X X X X X 14

Note: Question grouping: RQ = reporting quality; SD = study design; RB = risk of bias (Kiss et al. 2018). Ratings: ✓= criteria met; – = don’t know/partially met; X = criteria not met.