Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;93(3):813–840. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09994-3

Table 2.

Summary of primary outcomes and secondary outcomes reported by remote intervention studies

N Article Primary Outcome* Secondary outcomes*
01 Chen et al. [30]

↑ Physical activity

(N = 15, p = 0.15, r = 0.39)

 = weight

 = BMI

 = quality of life

 = feasibility and usage frequency

02 Lee et al. [28]

↑ Physical activity

(N = 16, p = 0.11, r = 0.40)

 = Abdominal circumference

 = BMI

 = Weight

 = Blood pressure

 = Laboratorial biomarkers (e.g., total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides, glucose, lipid profile)

03 Temmingh et al. [29]

↓ Weight

(N = 467, logscale β = -0.0004705, p < 0.001)

↓ BMI

↓ Abdominal circumference

↑ General health

04 Gyllensten and Forsberg [24]

 = Physical activity

(N = 44, non-significant between and within groups)**

 = Blood pressure

 = Weight

 = BMI

 = Abdominal circumference

 = Quality of life

 = Social interaction

 = Functionality

05 Naslund et al. [27] Association between cardiovascular risk reduction and weight loss and number of interactions in the Facebook group (respectively (N = 18, t = 2.12, p = 0.06, and N = 19, t = -2.26, p = 0.06) No significant association between improved fitness and number of interactions in the Facebook group
06 Naslund et al. [26] Higher daily step count was significantly associated with greater weight loss (N = 34, F = 5.07, df = 1.32, p = 0.0314) Daily step count was significantly associated with fitness change (N = 34, F = 1.92, df = 1.31, p = 0.176)
07 Young et al. [25] ↓ BMI in WebMOVE (t = 3.3, p = 0.001) compared with either in-person (t = 0.10, p = 0.92) or usual care (t = − 0.25, p = 0.80) Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was well received

N number of participants who completed intervention in each study, r calculation of effect size, r, by dividing the z value by the square root of N (the number of total observations or sample)

*Comparison between intervention group (or equivalent) and control group after the end of intervention (or follow-up assessment)

** p-values were not reported in the study