Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;213:113754. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113754

Table 1.

Main features of the construction of the compared evaluations of excess deaths.

eLife Lancet Economist WHO Levitt
Reference period years 2015–2019 2010 (or earliest available)-February 2020 Unclear, not mentioned 2015–2019 (countries with monthly historical data); 2000–2019 (country with annual historical data) 2017–2019
Modeling of reference period Linear fit Ensemble of 6 models (weighted): 4 using splines with different placement of the last knot, one Poisson, and one taking 2019 only Machine learning. Mix of boosted Gradient, Random Forest and Bootstrapping. Sum of an annual trend (thin-plated spline) and a within-year seasonal variation (cyclic cubic spline) Static average
Exclusions Heat waves Heat waves Unclear, not mentioned Not mentioned No
Time unit of modeling data Weekly (preferred) or monthly or quarterly Weekly or monthly Weekly for most, some monthly Monthly Weekly
Pandemic time period covered in the original publication/release Varies per country, mostly 2020 to mid-2021, exact start in 2020 depends on availability of weekly (week 10), monthly (March), or quarterly (January) data 2020–2021 (acknowledged potential problem with late registration for last weeks/months) 2020 to late 2021 2020–2021 (had also released early estimates for 2020) 2020–2021
Pandemic time period covered in the current comparative analysis 2020–2021 2020–2021 2020–2021 2020–2021 2020–2021
Source of data for all-cause mortality Human Mortality Database, others World Mortality Database, Human Mortality Database, European Statistical Office World Mortality Database, Human Mortality Database, others Eurostat, Human Mortality Database, World Mortality Database Human Mortality Database
Source of data for COVID-19 deaths used in original paper Johns Hopkins Apparently Johns Hopkins (although too high for Spain and UK) Unclear Not used Johns Hopkins
Source of data for COVID-19 deaths used in the current comparative analysis Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins
Age adjustment No No (authors stated that they may adjust for age in future work) No Yes (excess deaths summed across 7 age strata) Yes (excess deaths summed across 5 age strata), also done without age-adjustment
Gender adjustment in calculations No No No Yes No
Any other adjustment No Under-registration corrected for countries with <95% death registration Probably no (unclear) No No
Eligibility criteria for countries modeled directly Weekly, monthly or quarterly data available for at least one pre-pandemic year and for pandemic period Weekly or monthly data available for any pre-pandemic years and for pandemic period Data availability (unclear about details) Data availability (Age and sex specific death for 2020 aggregated to 5-year age bands), excluding the countries that have experienced conflict, small population numbers, incomplete deaths and/or erratic/implausible age-pattern Weekly data available in Human Mortality Database from 2017 onwards
Number of countries modeled directly 103 in the publication. 77 with data to December 2021 74 countries and territories in the publication 78 countries apparently had mortality data, but it seems that all countries were included in the machine learning 50 36
Eligibility criteria for countries inferred from the directly modeled countries None All countries considered Unclear All countries. All data for 2021 were inferred None
Number of countries inferred from the directly modeled countries None Remaining world Remaining world Remaining world None
How were they inferred? Not applicable LASSO regression, selected 15 covariates related to pandemic (e.g. seroprevalence) and to background population health metrics (e.g. Healthcare Access and Quality Index) Machine learning as above; totally impossible to reproduce based on thinly presented information, 121 indicators considered K-mean clustering. Countries are divided into 5 clusters with different values of, Human Development Index Mean age at death, Crude excess rate Not Applicable