Table 3.
Reliability of Change Coefficients and Standard Errors of Measurement
| Abstinence Self-Efficacy | Coping Strategies | Depression | Anxiety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||
| No. Items (ni) | Coef. | SEM | Coef. | SEM | Coef. | SEM | Coef. | SEM |
|
| ||||||||
| As administered* | .87 | 6.2 | .90 | 0.10 | .87 | 0.09 | .86 | 0.15 |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | .57 | 13.8 | .22 | 0.53 | .24 | 0.40 | .40 | 0.44 |
| 2 | .72 | 9.8 | .37 | 0.37 | .39 | 0.28 | .57 | 0.31 |
| 3 | .80 | 8.0 | .47 | 0.30 | .49 | 0.23 | .67 | 0.25 |
| 4 | .84 | 6.9 | .54 | 0.26 | .56 | 0.20 | .73 | 0.22 |
| 5 | .87 | 6.2 | .59 | 0.24 | .61 | 0.18 | .77 | 0.20 |
| 6 | .63 | 0.22 | .66 | 0.16 | .80 | 0.18 | ||
| 7 | .67 | 0.20 | .69 | 0.15 | .82 | 0.17 | ||
| 8 | .70 | 0.19 | .72 | 0.14 | .84 | 0.16 | ||
| 9 | .72 | 0.18 | .74 | 0.13 | .86 | 0.15 | ||
| 10 | .74 | 0.17 | .76 | 0.13 | ||||
| 11 | .76 | 0.16 | .78 | 0.12 | ||||
| 12 | .78 | 0.15 | .79 | 0.12 | ||||
| 13 | .79 | 0.15 | .81 | 0.11 | ||||
| 14 | .80 | 0.14 | .82 | 0.11 | ||||
| 15 | .81 | 0.14 | .83 | 0.10 | ||||
Note. Coef.=reliability of change coefficient, SEM=standard error of measurement for within-person change. Coefficients reflecting poor, fair, and good reliability of change are shown using roman, italic, and bold fonts, respectively. Coefficients reflect the amount of variance related to changes in scores over time that is attributable to reliable change. See text for details. For consistency in the table, SEM values are always computed with the assumption that total scale scores are computed by averaging rather than summing items. For measures that are typically summed (i.e., depression, anxiety), the SEM must be multiplied by number of items administered to properly compute the SEM for summed scores.
As administered in the parent trial, the number of items was 5 (self-efficacy), 30 (coping strategies), 21 (depression), and 9 (anxiety).