Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;12:10634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13928-1

Table 3.

3-fold averaged confusion matrix value results after applying optimal thresholds and the single tile removal post-processing to the DenseNet-161 and ensemble models, for the hold-out test sets.

Model TN TP FN FP
DenseNet-161 30880 + 672 1081 + 3 70 + 5 3171 + 651
- 651 - 5 - 3 - 672
DenseNet-161 (threshold per fold + post-processed) 33505 + 27 929 + 32 222 + 37 546 + 19
- 19 - 37 - 32 - 27
DenseNet-161 (mean 3-fold threshold + post-processed) 33479 + 143 929 + 12 222 + 12 572 + 126
- 126 - 12 - 12 - 143
Ensemble 32119 + 1053 1063 + 26 88 + 44 1932 + 1048
- 1048 - 44 - 26 - 1053
Ensemble (threshold per fold + post-processed) 33221 + 101 983 + 57 168 + 69 830 + 184
- 184 - 69 - 57 - 101
Ensemble (mean 3-fold threshold + post-processed) 33180 + 504 1002 + 37 149 + 68 871 + 460
- 460 - 68 - 37 - 504

Presented in this table are the true negative (TN), true positive (TP), false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) values averaged across all three folds, rounded to the nearest whole figure. Plus/minus values shows the mean subtracted from the highest and lowest results from the 3-fold experiments, for each model.