Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;19(2):464–475. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01200-3

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and risk of bias assessment of the 11 studies

First author Study type N N SMA type 1 N SMA type 2 N SMA type 3 N SMA type 4 Age, years (range) Ambulant (%) Scoliosis* (%) RoB
De Wel 2020 Cohort Total 48 0 15 30 3 37.1 (20–66) 20.8 41.7 Low risk
Treated group 16 0 0 14 2 37.5 (22–66) 43.7 0
Faravelli 2019 Case series 12 0 0 12 0 28.5 (15–34.8) 83.3 0 Fair
German multicenter cohorta Cohorts 139 2 47 89 1 37 (16–65) 37 22 Low risk
Inan 2020 Case series 40 0 4 36 0 34.4 (19–60) 42.5 15 High risk
Jochmann 2020 Case series 7 0 4 3 0 45 (20–68) 14.2 42.8 Low risk
Maggi 2020 Cohort 116 0 13 103 0 34 (18–72) 34.5 13.8 Low risk
Moshe-Lilie 2020 Case series Total 22 0 9 13 0 36 (20–71) 9 77 Low risk
Treated group 10 0 0 33 (20–48)
SHINE study 2020 b Case series 7 0 1 6 0 14.4 (13–16) 71.4 na Fair
Veerapandiyan 2020 Case series 12 1 4 7 0 22 (12–52) 25 66.7 Low risk
Walter 2019 Cohort 19 0 0 19 0 34 (18–59) 63 0 Low risk
Yeo 2020 Case series 6 0 0 6 0 29.9 (24.9–56.5) 67 0 Low risk
Total 428 3 97 324 4 12–72 36.4% 24%

N number of patients, SMA spinal muscular atrophy, na non-applicable, RoB, risk of bias

*Previous surgery for scoliosis and/or severe scoliosis

aHagenacker 2020 and Freigang 2021 reports

bMuntoni 2020 report