Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;13:859332. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.859332

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics and parameters of the ovarian reserve between groups.

Variables PM 0 (n = 213) PM 1(n = 99) PM 2 (n = 46) PM 3 (n = 35) P-value
<35 years 138 (64.00%) 49 (49.49%) 25 (54.35%) 19 (54.29%) 0.061
≥35 years 75 (35.21%) 50 (50.51%) 21 (45.65%) 16 (45.71%)
BMI (kg/m2) 20.83 (19.48, 23.01) 21.08 (19.29, 23.23) 21.01 (19.42, 23.46) 21.64 (20.03, 24.03) 0.340
AMH (ng/ml) 4.04 (2.32, 6.93) 3.40 (2.05, 5.06) 3.14 (1.36, 6.10) 2.55 (1.30, 3.78) 0.001
AFC (number) 10 (7, 15) 8 (6, 12) 8 (6, 10) 6 (5, 10) <0.001
FSH (IU/L) 5.55 (4.67, 6.67) 5.79 (4.79, 6.96) 5.20 (4.53, 6.92) 5.83 (4.52, 7.58) 0.641
E2 (pg/ml) 34.00 (26.25, 45.75) 36.00 (27.00, 44.00) 35.00 (27.00, 46.00) 36.00 (29.00, 55.00) 0.636
LH (IU/L) 3.48 (2.66, 4.45) 3.21 (2.49, 4.18) 3.58 (2.25, 4.35) 3.28 (2.58, 4.16) 0.745
FSH/LH(value) 1.63 (1.21, 2.27) 1.75 (1.38, 2.35) 1.77 (1.33, 2.28) 1.74 (1.21,2.60) 0.598

Nonnormally distributed data were presented as numbers (%) or as medians (interquartile ranges).

OR, ovarian reserve; PM0, no previous miscarriages; PM1, one previous miscarriage; PM2, two previous miscarriages; PM3, three or more previous miscarriages; BMI, body mass index; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; AFC, antrum follicle count; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; E2, estradiol; LH, luteinizing hormone.