Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;50(11):6224–6234. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac432

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Data collection and processing Model comparison
 Magnification ×105 000  Nonhydrogen atoms 5990
 Voltage (kV) 300  Protein residues 665
 Electron exposure e2 54 B factors (Å2)
 Defocus range (μm) 0.8 to 2.0  Protein 28–633
 Pixel size (Å) 0.84 r.m.s. deviations
 Symmetry imposed C1  Bond lengths (Å2) 0.0060
 Initial particle images (no) 539000  Bond angles (°) 1.3192
 Final particle images (no) 149000 Validation
 Map resolution (Å) 3.6  MolProbity score 1.49
 FSC threshold 1.43  Clashscore 5.24
 Map resolution range (Å) 3.6 to >5.5  Poor rotamers (%) 0.36
Refinement Ramachandran plot
 Initial model used 1NHI  Favoured (%) 96.66
 Model resolution (Å) 3.7  Allowed (%) 3.44
 FSC threshold 0.143  Disallowed (%) 0.0
 Map sharpening B factor (Å2) 70