Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 14;63(7):611–618. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.611

Table 2. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Beta-Lactam Group and Glycopeptide Group after Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.

Variables Beta-lactam group (n=195*) Glycopeptide group (n=149*) Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Recurrent bloodstream infection, no. (%) 5 (2.6) 6 (4.0) 1.25 (0.33–4.83) 0.743
Recurrence within 30 days 1 (0.5) 3 (2.0) 2.86 (0.23–35.46) 0.414
Recurrence within 90 days (31 days to 90 days) 4 (2.1) 3 (2.0) 0.84 (0.16–4.48) 0.835
Persistent bloodstream infection, no. (%) 35 (17.9) 6 (4.0) 0.28 (0.14–0.60) <0.001
ICU admission after infection, no. (%) 38 (19.5) 31 (20.8) 1.35 (0.84–2.17) 0.217
Mortality, no. (%) 31 (15.9) 59 (39.6) 1.64 (1.07–2.52) 0.024
Death within 7 days 4 (2.1) 21 (14.1) 5.17 (2.08–12.85) <0.001
Death within 28 days (8 days to 28 days) 15 (7.7) 46 (30.9) 1.85 (1.15–2.99) 0.012
Drug adverse event, no. (%) 28 (14.4) 9 (6.0) 0.47 (0.24–0.91) 0.025

CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit.

*A total of 15 cases with insufficient data for adjustment (inverse probability of treatment weighting) were excluded; The odds ratio for glycopeptide group compared to beta-lactam group was calculated by weighted logistic regression model using inverse probability of treatment weighting.