Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;12(12):2062. doi: 10.3390/nano12122062

Table 1.

Comparison of the present work with previously reported BPDC-based MOFs for porosity and supercapacitive performance.

Sample Surface Area (m2·g−1) Average Diameter (nm) Electrolyte Scan Rate (mV·s−1) Current Density (A·g−1) Rct
(Ω)
Capacitance
(F·g−1)
Ref.
C-BPDC 1137 4.2 6M KOH 1 0.34 170 [40]
Al-BPDC 415.2 18.5 6M KOH 0.25 3.25 119 [39]
C-BPDC 843 0.53 6M KOH 1 1.23 256 [41]
Ni-BPDC 347 32.7 6M KOH 1 1.10 328 [16]
Ni-BPDC 6M KOH 1 0.65 432 [17]
Ni-BPDC 311.99 29.16 3M KOH 1 0.49 488 This Work