Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;14(12):2421. doi: 10.3390/nu14122421

Table 1.

Studies assessing the association between AGE concentrations and dementia.

Study Study Design Sample Size Age (Mean ± SD) Years Participant Sex (Male) AGE Measure Results
Adams et al., 2017 Cross-sectional 816 66.0 ± 9.9 46.6% Serum AGE Higher AGEs were associated with poorer digit symbol substitution test performance and decreased grey matter volume.
Chen et al., 2021 Longitudinal 3889 72.5 ± 8.9 43.8% Skin AGE, Plasma EN-RAGE & S-RAGE At baseline, higher EN-RAGE associated with higher prevalence of dementia, whereas higher S-RAGE associated with a lower prevalence.
After 12.4 years on average, only EN-RAGE was associated with dementia prevalence.
Chou et al., 2019 Longitudinal 25 79.0 ± 5.8 12% Plasma AGE Higher AGEs were associated with a decline in the CDR after a 48.6 ± 2.1 month follow-up in people with AD and T2DM.
Drenth et al., 2017 Longitudinal 144 80.7 ± 7.7 43.7% Skin AGE Functional ability was associated with AGE levels and dementia progression over one year.
Lotan et al., 2021 Randomized control trial 75 Intervention:
71.9 ± 4.29
Control:
71.42 ± 3.99
Intervention:
77.1%
Control:
72.5%
Serum AGE Reduced dietary AGE intake and standard dietary advice improved cognitive performance in people with T2DM.
More improvement was observed in people with MCI in the intervention group.

Legend: CDR = clinical dementia rating; esRAGE = endogenous secretory RAGE; GAD = general anxiety disorder; NA = not assessed; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; sRAGE = soluble receptor for advanced glycation end product.