Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;6(3):zrac057. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac057

Table 1.

Description of patient characteristics at baseline of a case–control study comparing robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release and open transversus abdominis release

rTAR oTAR P *
n = 90 n = 79
Age (years), mean(s.d.) 66 (11) 63 (14) 0.075
Women 57 (63.3) 42 (53.2) 0.181
BMI (kg/m2), mean(s.d.) 8.5 (31) 5.3 (30) 0.350
Current smoker 15 (16.7) 23 (30.3) 0.038
Co-morbidities
 Cardiac disease 21 (23.3) 19 (24.1) >0.009
 Diabetes mellitus 17 (18.9) 13 (16.5) 0.680
 Hepatic disease 1 (1.1) 0 (0) 0.261
 Previous malignancy 23 (25.6) 23 (29.1) 0.604
 Pulmonary disease 10 (11.1) 6 (7.6) 0.582
 Renal disease 10 (11.1) 4 (5.1) 0.229
Hernia characteristics
 Recurrent incisional hernia 21 (23.3) 14 (17.7) 0.369
 Hernia width (cm), mean(s.d.) 8.7 (3.2) 10.0 (4.4) 0.031
 Hernia length (cm), mean(s.d.) 11.6 (5.3) 14.1 (6.2) 0.005

rTAR, robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release; oTAR, open transversus abdominis release. Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

*

For normally distributed continuous variables, an independent samples t test was used. When a normal distribution could not be assumed, a Mann–Whitney U test was used. The chi-squared and Fisher’s test were used to compare categorical data. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.